To a certain extend, sure.A question for all agnostics:
Are you an apatheist?
Well, they don't actually know that god exists. It is something that must be taken on faith.
They claim to know, which makes them dishonest.
Anyway - why call this the ask the agnostic page if it's really a ask the atheist page? Why even state you are agnostic, when it is simply obvious you are just like everyone else?
Unlike agnostic, not everyone are atheists. There are theists and atheists. That is why there is a discussion between them.Yes, they do know it with all certainty. Faith is sometimes involved, but there usually is no doubt that whatever God they believe in exists.
Why call this the ask the atheist page, when it's really ask a human being page? Why even state that you are atheist, when it is simply obvious you are just like everyone else - you breathe, you have a pulse, you have a brain, and so on...
What does this have to do with Agnosticism?Is an agnostic someone who believes they can spell, or knows they cannot spell?
There are a lot of people who have no idea whatsoever about God. It has been handed to them by others and their environment. God would be no more real to them, than the university professor living next door. This neighbor is a friendly man, and may even have tossed a baseball back and forth every once in a while. However, unless there is a revelation given that this man is a professor, it may not dawn on this individual until one day at age 19 he is sitting in the man's class in college.
I agree with Ziggy that there is no sliding scale. We are all humans with different knowledge imbedded in the memory net called the brain. Knowledge may be there that we are not even aware of until we face it head on. What we choose to believe may be totally different than what we actually know. That is the reality of the thing we call the human mind, and it's ability to be dilusional or sane, or neither.
Unlike agnostic, not everyone are atheists. There are theists and atheists. That is why there is a discussion between them.
But who will discuss with the agnostic with Gnostic to god are nothing but stupid/dishonest people?
I think we need to define truth here.Declaring non-agnostics stupid and dishonest and claiming that everyone should therefore be agnostic is not a good method of fostering discussion.
Not everyone is an agnostic. Some know the truth that there is a God. Some know the truth that God is other things. Some know the truth that there is no God.
What's hot? Hotness is a relative trait, it isn't a thing that exist.It could be a subjective truth. Is it true that it is hot? Questions such as those are often best answered using fuzzy logic.
As are many questions about degrees of belief.
So god is a quantum particle with existence as his wave function?What would Heisenberg have to say about that?
EDIT: Probably "I'm not certain"![]()
So god is a quantum particle with existence as his wave function?
That makes no sense. What?Or is God every single quantum particle and His existence is "un" quantifiable?
What would Heisenberg have to say about that?
That makes no sense. What?
You forgot to make the case why it could be regarded as such. Until then the only answer I can give you is: Because it isn't..Why not regard Pascal's Wager as a hedge to atheism/agnosticism?