tristangreer
Warlord
I have a 128MB ATI Radeon 9200. I never had the renderer error and was able to play the game. No graphical problems, but the slowdown is a major problem. I'll try it out and see how it works.
tristangreer said:But that doesn't matter now, since I only meet the minimum and can't play the game past 40 turns without so much slowdown that it's impossible to do anything.
I used to run XP with 128 MB Ram.Bulwark said:Although the min system requirements may have been stated wrong at first, some people here are really making a huge deal out of it. Let's be honest, the minimum RAM required to run XP is 128. I don't know anyone who runs Windows with the minimum requirements. Even the most economical system by todays standards comes with no less than 512 Ram. If you're still running 256, you might want to think about an upgrade, another 256 cost as low as $30.
Bulwark said:Let's be honest, the minimum RAM required to run XP is 128.
Aussie_Lurker said:Well, as Willem has already stated, I do agree that they dropped the ball on this particular issue-and should have really jumped in quicker to rectify the problem. The only suggestion I can personally make for those running 512MB systems is-change your Windows interface to Win98 mode and play the game in windowed mode. I am not making any guarantees, but it MIGHT help!!
Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
Bast said:Oh that's news to me!
So I suppose they could've just put min requirements as Pentium 400, 16MB Ram and any Windows compatible video card or something. Yeah you'll be fine!![]()
In all fairness, the system requirements were only added to the websites after the game was released. While the game was available for pre-order (and pre-ordering was promoted by the producer with a special version in US) there were no official requirements. In fact, on October 21 I received an e-mail from Kelley Gilmore - Marketing Manager Firaxis - that said 256 minimum without distinguishing the OS.Willem said:No, it's been there since the web site was put up. I forget when that was now. And there's been tons of threads here and over at Apolyton for months now that have been mentioning the same info. And no they weren't given faulty info, 256 is the minimum, but for 2000. Granted they could have been somewhat clearer about that.
At any rate, anyone who knows even a little about computers should know that 256 for XP is inadequate if you hope to run anything well. The OS alone requires almost 200 meg. 512 should be considered a minimum for any application, with 1 gig or more recommended.
Agreed. Apparently they don't feel comfortable setting a higher recommendation than 512 for XP - or someone didn't realise that minimum and recommended for XP are now the same (surely possible).A'AbarachAmadan said:Interesting that online they say 512 minimum for XP and 512 recommended. Weird that they would be the same.
Bulwark said:If you're still running 256, you might want to think about an upgrade, another 256 cost as low as $30.
tristangreer said:Just curious if anyone from Firaxis or any of the mods are willing to address the changing system requirements. My comp. has 512MB RAM and I was led to believe this was above the minimum requirement, but now I'm told it is the minimum, and if I experience gameplay issues it is because of that. Why did they give us a lower number to begin with, and why haven't they made any kind of attempt to announce the change?
tristangreer said:Just curious if anyone from Firaxis or any of the mods are willing to address the changing system requirements. My comp. has 512MB RAM and I was led to believe this was above the minimum requirement, but now I'm told it is the minimum, and if I experience gameplay issues it is because of that. Why did they give us a lower number to begin with, and why haven't they made any kind of attempt to announce the change?