Average OT IQ Poll

I'd score -

  • higher than the poster above me

    Votes: 17 53.1%
  • lower than the poster above me

    Votes: 15 46.9%

  • Total voters
    32
I thought our IQ scores were that little number next to "posts" under our name.

It probably is so, or at least some admins told me as much, and they also noted that i should not care about the chance effect that the number seems to increase (maybe even by 1?) after each new post one makes. It is deemed as established that it increases due to a direct relation between posting more on CFC and having ever-expanding intelligence.
I just wish i could have access to the details of that calculation... But admins know best :yup:
 
I thought our IQ scores were that little number next to "posts" under our name.

Pshaw! This is plain nonsense as my "IQ score" should assure you.

"Posts" is a fencing term. And I don't mean that business involving waving sharp pointy things about.
 
If you think that, I wager you just haven't spent enough time hanging out with neuroscientists and engineers.

I'm gonna bump this thread due to my finding of this fine paper -

http://www.quantonics.com/Whats_Wrong_EPR_QELR_Table.html#Real

About quantium mechanics. The paper is rather old, but it's very fun to read.

As for Zelig - my first serious bridge partner was a 51 year old man, an engineer. I was 22 at the time. Can't say he wasn't gifted, he was for sure. But for me, being nearly 30 years younger, he patrionised me too much and when i learned everything i could from him, i couldn't bear him anymore.

The struggle with high iq people is not to get absorbed in their ego (know that you know almost nothing, since you are a human).
 
Back
Top Bottom