1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Basics: When to use slavery efficient.

Discussion in 'Civ4 Strategy Articles' started by Mutineer, Mar 19, 2006.

  1. Mutineer

    Mutineer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,715
    Slavery, when it's use is efficient.
    Slavery let as whip population for hummers.

    On normal speed 1 population will produce 30 hummers. Each slavery whip cost 1 happiness.
    Town size 1 needs 22 foods to grow to size 2.

    So, roundly, 1 unit of food will produce 1.5 hummers.
    With granary, it will be 3 hummers.

    So, in best conditions, slavery converts 1 food to 3 hummers.
    Towns need 30 foods to grow to size 5. With granary size 5 cities convert 1 food into 2 hummers.

    What our other option to convert food to hummers?
    Grassland hill mine convert 1 food into 3 hummers.
    Plain hill mine convert 2 foods into 4 hummers.
    So, if we ignoring happiness and health, Grassland mine is always better then slavery in any conditions. Plain hill mine become equal to slavery for city size 5.

    Any town by default have 2 food, so if you happiness let you have size 2 town and it working 2 plain hill mines he is in optimum for hummer production. Any use of slavery will only decrease this town hummer production.
    In addition, any act of using slavery decrease max size of town by one. For town at there max and having ability to work plain forest or irrigated plains cost of slavery come to 10 lost hummers.

    I did try to create a table when slavery is better then normal production, but it is a bit to complicate and depends on available ties.

    So, I just write basic conclusion:

    When all food surpluses could be converted to hummers using grassland hill mines – slavery is always a bad idea.

    When all food surpluses can be converted to hummers using plain hill mines slavery is bad idea over town size 3.
    When all food surpluses can be converted to hummers by plain forest slavery is a bad idea in town size > 5.
     
  2. Smokey McDope

    Smokey McDope Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    134
    I don't know about you, but in my part of the world "hummer" means *******. Perhaps you meant hammers?

    Oh wow this place has kiddie block. Well the starred out word is the long form of BJ.
     
  3. Lord Chambers

    Lord Chambers Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2001
    Messages:
    988
    Gentlemen usually exchange 1 food over dinner, then get 1 hummer back at the cottage, but if you're Aggressive then you might not need the food.
     
  4. Rod

    Rod Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    754
    Location:
    Munich / Germany
    The decision about using the whip is certainly much more complicated and is involving more than the optimization of the terrain. That you need an optimized terrain is for sure, but even the optimization should follow up your basic strategy .. which way to win.

    Slavery is also involving the question of how much is a turn worth ? Basically the rushing of buildings has to follow this question, how long can I wait for this building in exactly this city. The taxation of course depends on the importance of the city ("I can not wait too long, because only this city can produce in a sufficient time : units, special buildings, wonders, missionaries etc.).

    It depends on the food base of the city ('The city is back on track in the same/earlier time, like it would need to finish the building in a normal way')

    It depends on the importance of the building ('The sixth bank ! Who cares for the 4 peasants ?' The cathredal will enable me to reach this oil resource in only a few turns. Let's get out a whip ! )

    All this complex decision you can not summarize in a table. Everybody has to make his own decision to push his civilization over the bottom line.
    Peter the Great let his peasants die to build up St. Peterburg, to get a harbour in the Baltic Sea - in game terms, this mean a coastal city and you have astronomy, so now you sell all this 5 spare furs for 4 or 5 each and you even may trade in this Marble and Stones to double production of Hermitage ....
     
  5. cabert

    cabert Big mouth

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,710
    Location:
    France
    there are various situations where the whip is either the only way or the best way :
    - you have just one warrior defending your city and you finally connected that copper/iron, when the barbarian (or AI's) hordes show up.
    Do you give up your whole city or just one pop to get an axeman?
    - you have plenty unhappy people: do i grow even more unhappiness, or do i whip a temple? you trade 2 unhappy people against one temple (one happyness, against one unhappyness for ten turns, then full bonus of one happyness when the one pop is back. Meanwhile you could have another happy building in sight)
    - you don't grow anymore, the building is very urgent. You whip one pop to get the building that lets you grow further (health bonus, granary for instance)

    I do whip a lot, in my GP farm with 4 or 5 food bonuses !
     
  6. Elledge

    Elledge Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    57
    Hey, last Friday I bought 5 food and a Wine and only got 1 hummer. What's the big secret?

    EDIT: Oh, I see, apparently I need to live in at least a size 2 town for optimum hummer production.
     
  7. mattspoker

    mattspoker Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    14
    alea iacta est translates much better as the die IS cast. was cast if you want to really use the perfect tense, but is does better in english because the phrase(more greek corruption than latin) means the die is still turning. Using has been suggest complketion of the roll. When crossing the rubicon the verdict was rather up in the air!
     
  8. Zombie69

    Zombie69 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    I'm pretty sure it's "alea jacta est", with a J. At least that's how it's always presented in French, a latin language.
     
  9. RemoWilliams

    RemoWilliams Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    183
    It's been a while since I took latin, but I'm pretty sure there was no J in latin.

    So, Julius Caesar was actually IULIUSCAESAR (they didn't have spaces or small letters either).:mischief:
     
  10. Rod

    Rod Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    754
    Location:
    Munich / Germany
    Hello,

    the translation : 'the dice is cast' is certainly better. My translation 'the dice has fallen' was simply bad English or 'Denglisch'.

    'Denglisch' means Deutsch-Englisch and describes the habit of us Germans simply to translate our phrases word by word into English. So in German we translate 'alea iacta est' into 'Der Wuerfel ist gefallen' which means (word by word) 'the dice has fallen :).

    There is certainly no J in Latin.
    Maybe you ever saw a Christian Crux that inscribes INRE ?
    INRE is nothing but :IESUS NAZARETUS REX IUDAE (or someting similiar - I am no Christian, sorry) - in anyway we call IESUS nowadays Jesus and the Iudae are nothing but the Jews :)
     
  11. n0xie

    n0xie OCC-addict

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    246
    Location:
    Netherlands
    INRI stands for Iesus (Jesus) Nazarenus (the Nazorean) Rex (Leader) Iudaeorum (of Judea) which roughly translates to Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. As you can see, latin does not have a 'J'.
     
  12. Zombie69

    Zombie69 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    Latin may not have a J, but we do say Julius Caesar and Jesus, so why not also say alea jacta est. I guess both methods make sense. One seems to be the accepted norm in French (which tends to translate latin expressions, wholly or partly), and the other in English (which tends to keep them as is).

    As for the meaning of alea jacta est, again in French we have a more liberal translation, "le sort en est jeté", which translated literally in English would give "fate is thus cast".
     
  13. Crighton

    Crighton Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,136
    Frankly I use the whip on newly conquered cities to cut down on unhappiness etc etc. In one game I converted 192 of my own citizens into usefull structures, humans make for a good binding agent during construction :)
     
  14. Zombie69

    Zombie69 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    Rex isn't Leader, Rex literally means King. In French, King is Roi, which is obvisouly pretty close to Rex. It's even closer in Italian (Re), Spanish (Rey) and Portugese (Rei), the other 3 modern day latin languages.
     
  15. RemoWilliams

    RemoWilliams Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    183
    I've never heard it pronounced that way though, I've always heard it pronounced "yacta". Not that I care all that much, but you corrected someone else incorrectly, so I re-corrected your correction.;)
     
  16. cabert

    cabert Big mouth

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,710
    Location:
    France
    jacta is how it's written in french/latin dictionnaries, it's a famous citation always written alea jacta est in every Asterix
     
  17. Zombie69

    Zombie69 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    And pronounced "alea jacta est" in every Asterix movie.
     
  18. maltz

    maltz Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    967
    As the original post suggests I find Slavery not useful in any high food city that has a few hills. The ideal slave center would be a waterfront city with many seafood but very few hills.

    I use slavery primarily to rush temples (the angry face is offset by the temple's happy face), wonders, or a pre-req to wonder and I have a Great Engineer waiting. I also prefer to whip when the lost pop will be substrated from the lazy citizens. This way I don't really lose any production power.
     
  19. cabert

    cabert Big mouth

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,710
    Location:
    France
    seems to me the best way to go for cities you build yourself

    I tend to whip a lot more than this on captured cities.
    For two good reasons :
    - there is often a whole bunch of lazy ones
    - quite often, they are starving anyway (lack of culture->no tiles to work->no food)
     

Share This Page