3Miro
Deity
I think special Mercs should be visible in the civilopedia, just add a note that those are merc only units.
Keshiks and Seljuks are also visible, right?
Beta 12
- Thread starter AbsintheRed
- Start date
I think special Mercs should be visible in the civilopedia, just add a note that those are merc only units.
Keshiks and Seljuks are also visible, right?
merijn_v1
Black Belt
No. Those aren't. Although you can see them, if you do some effort.
ezzlar
Emperor
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Messages
- 1,844
Go for the unit categories and you will find them IIRC.
AbsintheRed
Deity
I'm kind of insulted by that "graphic people" comment 
Anyway, these are the lines I already planned on putting into the major changes part of the changelog:
- Updates to quite a few leader attitudes and memories - it will result in more dinamically changing relations between the civs
- Revised most civs settler and war maps (in light of the new city name maps)
- These last two things along with 3Miro's AI regions and AI tweaks will finaly result in more wars with a much more competent AI
I will finish my changes regarding these in a week
Speaking of art, I would also like to replace Catherine and Barbarossa when melcher kurzer releases it
Anyway, these are the lines I already planned on putting into the major changes part of the changelog:
- Updates to quite a few leader attitudes and memories - it will result in more dinamically changing relations between the civs
- Revised most civs settler and war maps (in light of the new city name maps)
- These last two things along with 3Miro's AI regions and AI tweaks will finaly result in more wars with a much more competent AI
I will finish my changes regarding these in a week
Speaking of art, I would also like to replace Catherine and Barbarossa when melcher kurzer releases it
3Miro
Deity
You are right, I should have said "artistic".I'm kind of insulted by that "graphic people" comment
When you are updating the attitude, keep in mind that the current svn version isn't well balanced. I hope to fix that in the next couple of days.
Sounds good to me.
AbsintheRed
Deity
What if we add a new category for mercenaries in the civilopedia?
3Miro
Deity
Lots of code, but a good idea.
merijn_v1
Black Belt
I was also thinking about this. But I'm not capable of doing it.
Opera
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,643
How did you fix the pathing bug, 3Miro?
What do you want to change about Poland's UHVs? They seem good enough. Lithuania's #2 UHV could be changed to "Control the most territory in X".
Edit: I get a CTD when starting as Austria, during the autoplay.
What do you want to change about Poland's UHVs? They seem good enough. Lithuania's #2 UHV could be changed to "Control the most territory in X".
Edit: I get a CTD when starting as Austria, during the autoplay.
3Miro
Deity
I didn't. The areas let the AI make better decisions on what and how to settle/invade, however, the pathing bug is still there. I don't know what causes the bug, it seem random to me. Maybe it is due to mixing too many units of different speed.
I don't like the "produce the most food between xxx and xxx". While historic, it seems very artificial. What if Sweden doesn't invade, then how hard is it to achieve the goal.
Your idea about Lithuania sounds better, however, does it overlap with Poland or Hungary. I don't want to have two "become the largest country in Europe" UHV conditions.
AbsintheRed
Deity
Which version do you use, latest svn?
Opera
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,643
@AbsintheRed: yes
@3Miro: maybe you missed my earlier post? The bug isn't a bug it's a feature from Rhye, check CvSelectionGroup.cpp and look for canMoveThrough, there's a cap on the number of units you can move at once, it's 10 in RFCE, 20 in SoI.
You're probably right about the food one. The issue with Poland, Hungary, Lithuania and Moscowy is that they really had lots of territory so it's somewhat a no-brainer for them as a UHV. If we should pick one among them I'd say Lithuania or Poland, whichever would be the most challenging to achieve.
@3Miro: maybe you missed my earlier post? The bug isn't a bug it's a feature from Rhye, check CvSelectionGroup.cpp and look for canMoveThrough, there's a cap on the number of units you can move at once, it's 10 in RFCE, 20 in SoI.
You're probably right about the food one. The issue with Poland, Hungary, Lithuania and Moscowy is that they really had lots of territory so it's somewhat a no-brainer for them as a UHV. If we should pick one among them I'd say Lithuania or Poland, whichever would be the most challenging to achieve.
AbsintheRed
Deity
Yep, it would overlap with the Hungarian UHV
It's fitting for Hungary too in 1490, and is a bigger challenge for the player than it would be with Lithuania - there is too many room to expand with them
I think we should give something harder to them
AbsintheRed
Deity
Agreed, we can even add Kiev to the list
But I would still keep the UHV with Hungary, I find that one the most challenging
3Miro
Deity
How long have you known this and why didn't you tell me earlier!!!! .... I have been
for days ...OK now seriously:
Why is this even in the mod, do you know what the idea is? Why wouldn't someone be allowed to move a lot of units at once, all that this does is it makes the huge stacks that stay in cities and not go anywhere. In RFC stacks tend to be smaller so you don't see it so often, but in RFCE they really break the gameplay.
3Miro
Deity
I must have missed the comment on Monday (I wasted my time on the weekend).
I will take a closer look at Rhye's comment. If the fix is needed for something else, maybe we can get away with simply increasing the number to 30 or 40.
AbsintheRed
Deity
Ehh, crashed for me too. ~30-40 turns were back from the autoplay, so the bug happened around 1200
