"Beta" Massive WW2 scenario

Rocoteh said:
Hamah,

Soviet attacked Finland November 1939. Peace was signed March 1940.

By bombing several Finnish cities June 25 1941 a new state of
war again existed.

I reacted since you said it was wrong that Finland is at war
with Soviet when the Barbarossa scenario starts(it differs 3 days).

Then you stated that WW2 Global (with start date September 1939)
should have Soviet and Finland at war when the scenario starts,
despite the fact that Soviet attacked in November.

I must admit that discussions like this are rather pointless,
however if someone says "you are wrong!" when it concerns
facts that everyone can check I must react.

Everyone can make a memory-mistake.
That is OK.

Rocoteh
Click to expand...

I´m not angry nor disgusted, I only said what I said about debating because I wanted to excuse about being such a pain in the ass. :blush: I keep criticizing and you must be working hard to get this done well.

I enjoy you posting what you know because then I learn and it´s perfect that you say to me "you´re wrong" because it seems I am. I didn´t know about that new state of war and never read anything about it. I´m wondering now why occured to Stalin to bomb Finland again. What was the problem?
 
Rocoteh said:
WW2 Global will be delayed.
New target date: November 25.

Bug-hunting consumes much more time than I first thought.
This is due to the rapid expansion of the scenario.


Rocoteh

Download TGW-DIV 1.3:

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?postid=1694069#post1694069
Click to expand...

Don´t worry, I´ll gladly wait for that date. This is trully going to be excellent scenario.

Why should we download that TGW-DIV 1.3? Is it new?
 
Hamah said:
Don´t worry, I´ll gladly wait for that date. This is trully going to be excellent scenario.

Why should we download that TGW-DIV 1.3? Is it new?
Click to expand...

Hamah,

Yes I do not want WW2 Global to be disrupted by
undetected bugs.

The reason for the (temporary) sig-line for TGW-DIV 1.3 is this:

If you look at the front-page of the TGW-thread (the first post)
you will notice that there only some lines about TGW-DIV.

The result:

Download of TGW is 12-15 times each day.
Download of TGW-DIV is 3-4 each day.

Thus I am testing the temporary sig-line.
The first day I used it download of TGW-DIV increased to 12!

Rocoteh

Download TGW-DIV 1.3:

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?postid=1694069#post1694069
 
Rocoteh said:
Hamah,
The reason for the (temporary) sig-line for TGW-DIV 1.3 is this:

If you look at the front-page of the TGW-thread (the first post)
you will notice that there only some lines about TGW-DIV.

The result:

Download of TGW is 12-15 times each day.
Download of TGW-DIV is 3-4 each day.

Thus I am testing the temporary sig-line.
The first day I used it download of TGW-DIV increased to 12!

Rocoteh
Click to expand...
So the link in the first post of TGW didn't help that much?
Perhaps you could open a totally new thread named "Historical Scenarios by Rocoteh: WW1, WW2,..." or something similar. As you have invested so much into so many scenarios, a "library"/collection of your scenarios would be helpful and it would bring all the valuable scenarios together. Moreover that will most likely enhance interest - only if there is no negative side-effect that I am not yet aware of.
Another idea would be to start a general scenario library - similar to the new unit library that has been started in the units forum where every unit creator posts a list of his units and updates his list when he has released new ones.
Just an idea... :)

CellKu
 
well, we have LouLong's Conquests Scenarios Directory thread which kinda gives an overview of any scenario that is part of the thread, etc.

there is also the out-dated Scenario Library.

i like the idea of Historical Scenarios being seperated from non-historical or fantasy/hypothetical/alternate history.
 
CellKu said:
So the link in the first post of TGW didn't help that much?
Perhaps you could open a totally new thread named "Historical Scenarios by Rocoteh: WW1, WW2,..." or something similar. As you have invested so much into so many scenarios, a "library"/collection of your scenarios would be helpful and it would bring all the valuable scenarios together. Moreover that will most likely enhance interest - only if there is no negative side-effect that I am not yet aware of.
Another idea would be to start a general scenario library - similar to the new unit library that has been started in the units forum where every unit creator posts a list of his units and updates his list when he has released new ones.
Just an idea... :)

CellKu
Click to expand...

CellKu,

Thank you for your comments.
However I do not want to split current threads.

The last Sarevok/Rocoteh project have been done.
In the future (starting with the WW3 scenario) it will be
Rocoteh-only scenarios launched from their own threads.

Rocoteh
 
Drivebymaster said:
Wow Rocoteh you are one determined man.

So where are all of the custom units from?
Click to expand...

Drivebymaster,

They are from the SOE-project.

A great majority of the units have been created
by ripptide and Wyrmshadow.

Rocoteh
 
Wow, the screenshot is great! :goodjob: A good way to start some advertising. ;)
I am really looking forward to the release!

CellKu
 
CellKu,

Thank you.

Compressed size have now reached 80MB.
Then there is US Air custom units to add and
Japanese Air custom units.


Rocoteh
 
I must say rocoteh I impressed with the quality of your scenarios. I was just wondering what kind of detail you'll be putting in your scenario. Will units be generic fighter/artillery/armour, or will you have model differences like me 109e/f/g/k and 37mm/50mm and 75mm at, 75mm art 105m art and 150mm art?

ggm
 
ggm said:
I must say rocoteh I impressed with the quality of your scenarios. I was just wondering what kind of detail you'll be putting in your scenario. Will units be generic fighter/artillery/armour, or will you have model differences like me 109e/f/g/k and 37mm/50mm and 75mm at, 75mm art 105m art and 150mm art?

ggm
Click to expand...

ggm,

Thank you.

Since the limit for downloads at CFC is 100MB,
I had to set priority to some units.

Thus Germany, Soviet, USA, Britain (and Japan when it comes to air units)
have a broad range of armoured and air units.
With regard to naval units one unit always represent one ship.
Thus there are no flotilla units.

Should people like this scenario, I will seek for a
solution to add more custom units.


Rocoteh
 
That looks excellent Rocotech, you really are talented. :goodjob:
 
Hamah said:
That looks excellent Rocotech, you really are talented. :goodjob:
Click to expand...

Hamah,

Thank you.

Players reactions on this scenario will have heavy
impact with regard to if there will be more versions.

Its possible that I will use the 1 unit = 1 ship
that is used in WW2 Global in WW3 also.

Rocoteh
 
Excellent Rocoteh.

Are you not going to apply something similar to Barbarossa scenario?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hatul_Gadol
[C3C] Game of Thrones
Replies
19
Views
1K
RedMaul
R
Hatul_Gadol
[C3C] House of the Dragon: Battle for Westeros
2 3
Replies
44
Views
5K
Hatul_Gadol
Hatul_Gadol
Predator145
12.7mm DShK Heavy Machine Gun (Wheeled Infantry Version)
Replies
0
Views
326
Predator145
Predator145
S
Merging Marines and Paratroopers?
Replies
5
Views
511
timerover51
timerover51
AcaMetis
Nobles' Club 379: Gilgamesh of Sumeria
Replies
19
Views
881
soundjata
soundjata
Back
Top Bottom