Buddhist Monks are Happier

MummyMan

Emperor
Joined
May 9, 2001
Messages
1,094
"LONDON (Reuters) - Buddhists really are happy, calm and serene people -- at least according to their brain scans.

Using new scanning techniques, neuroscientists have discovered that certain areas of the brain light up constantly in Buddhists, which indicates positive emotions and good mood. This happens at times even when they are not meditating.


"We can now hypothesize with some confidence that those apparently happy, calm Buddhist souls one regularly comes across in places such as Dharamsala, India, really are happy," Professor Owen Flanagan, of Duke University in North Carolina, said Wednesday.


Dharamsala is the home base of exiled Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama.


The scanning studies by scientists at the University of Wisconsin at Madison showed activity in the left prefrontal lobes of experienced Buddhist practitioners. The area is linked to positive emotions, self-control and temperament.


Other research by Paul Ekman, of the University of California San Francisco Medical Center, suggests that meditation and mindfulness can tame the amygdala, an area of the brain which is the hub of fear memory.


Ekman discovered that experienced Buddhists were less likely to be shocked, flustered, surprised or as angry as other people.


Flanagan believes that if the findings of the studies can be confirmed they could be of major importance.


"The most reasonable hypothesis is that there is something about conscientious Buddhist practice that results in the kind of happiness we all seek," Flanagan said in a report in New Scientist magazine. "




With this in mind, would you reconsider your religous beliefs? If being Buddhist really does make you happier, would you dedicate yourself to it? And if a follower of a certain religion is proven to be happier than a follower of a different religion, does it validify the beliefs of that religion more? Opinions?
 
I can't just force myself to believe something I don't because it is healthy. That is like trying to force myself to enjoy exercise, or green vegetables because it is healthy.

And, I feel the need to point out that it wasn't Buddhists who managed to objectively prove a 'happiness' quotient.
 
If we all become Bhuddist monks. who is going to father the next generation?

Being a parent isn't easy - but it's a lot more practical.

I would like to see those brain scans compared to a high heroin user. I would suspect they would be very similar (Stay off it people - it really does screw you up).
 
I bet that at least part of it is that the people to whom Buddhism appeals tend to be mellower folks.

Buddhism is not necessarily about chastity. Every Buddhist I've ever met has children.

I like it.

Other faiths are the fingers, but Buddhism is the palm.
 
Originally posted by MummyMan
...
With this in mind, would you reconsider your religous beliefs? If being Buddhist really does make you happier, would you dedicate yourself to it? And if a follower of a certain religion is proven to be happier than a follower of a different religion, does it validify the beliefs of that religion more? Opinions?
I think it's not Buddhism but the lifestyle and mental discipline of the monks stuided that produceed their "happy" state.
 
Were there control groups also? Who were compared to those Buddhist monks? Maybe Buddhist laymen? Or Hindus? Or "general Westerners"? It would be interesting to know who are the people who are less happy than the Buddhist monks.
 
For your question: the amount of happiness enjoyed by the followers of one religion doesn't verify the principles and practices of that religions - at least not necessarily. For example: let's imagine that the Afghan version of the Muslim religion is the one and ultimate way to the goal of life. Imagine an Afghani women. She's bereft of almost all happiness - she hasn't freedom, she must be fully obedient to her husbend, she must wear a burkha even if there's 50 Celsius... because of her religion. She has so many suffering. But she follows the only true religion, and the joyful Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, atheists are all going to the hell.
The example is changeable: if you want, you can replace the Muslim women with a young Mormon boy who was sent to preach from Utah to Mongolia - or a Roman Catholic priest, who wants the celibacy invalid, but doesn't want to disobey it - or a Jehovah's Witness, who must go door-to-door distributing Watchtowers, and being despised and mocked while doing so, and in the meantime threatened with excommunication by his/her leaders if (s)he doesn't go preach... They aren't (fully) happy in their religion, but what if theirs is the only valid?
By the way, the less material desires one keeps, the less frustration one suffers, therefore the happier one will be. And Buddhism is pretty much giving up material desires.
 
Hey Caranamrta, are you part of Iskcon? ( I am intrigued by your sig)

Anyway, I can assure all the non-believers here that meditation and mindfulness DOES lead to a calmer and more focussed mind, if not a happier one,.. I have seen it myself:)
 
When I was a Sophmore in college my next door neighbor was Buddist from Sri Lanka who was studying to be a monk. He was a jerk, very arrogant. I have since wondered how he was doing as a monk. I always considered it one of life's little ironies.
 
Hey Caranamrta, are you part of Iskcon?

I chant Hare Krishna, i go even in the Iskcon temple to chant bhajans, and I go in an Iskcon-managed highscool (now), but I'm not really part of the institution - I'm uninitiated, and I can't accept the sabda (sadhu, guru and shastra) as the only sources of the truth, do not preach regularly (book distribution). Now I don't really know if I'm part of the Iskcon or not :confused:. However I accept Radha-Krishna as Supremes, the Hare Krishna as the main method of reaching Them - and I like caranamrta, that's why I have this name.
Why did you ask that?
When Moti was active in these forums, you wrote that Hinduism endorses evolution. Can you give me further details on this?
 
The report is no surprise. And it doesn't take being a Buddhist. If I can do it - and I'm not a Buddhist - so can they.

I learnt to meditate when I was 21. I also taught myself to live now, right now, in the present. And I learnt to be able be happy right now. Result: I have the potential to always be happy. It's my choice whether I stay that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom