Bug Reports and Technical Issues
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
Not on my end, you must have updated your VD module incorrectly.
I found twoin the Image of the World Square civilopedia entry, it's the first typeface error I've seen yet since that update the other week.
This is what it looks like to me, which seems fine. Can you explain more?
Sorry, but no error for me in both of these saves.
AOS9001
Slightly over 9000.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,447
Here's what it's like on my end:
It looks like where I see a hammer, you have a blank space (Z yande roud).
Oh, it didn't even occur to me that it could be in the description text. I think neither is correct, and the difference is what the invalid content is resolved to. Will have another look.
Gameboy2396
Chieftain
Gameboy2396
Chieftain
Never mind about that, I found the issue. Can you check your pull requests for DoC-Soundtrack in your GitHub and look for my pull request? I have fixed the issues.
Modules are not supported for the development version unless explicitly noted.
Gameboy2396
Chieftain
Jeez. I'm just fixing it up! I want to help.
I'm not saying anything against that. I am saying that modules are not supported for the development version unless explicitly noted.
Dominus the Mentat
Prince
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2018
- Messages
- 306
In 600 A.D. scenario, China begins with Taizong as leader, but after the first turn, the leaderhead changes to Hongwu. Save attached.
in 3000 B.C. Ghana begins with merchant trade civic, but in the 600 A.D. they begin with redistribution. Since Ghana was know for its vast trade connections and merchant trade help a lot in building wangaras, merchant trade should be the initial option in both scenarios.
in 3000 B.C. Ghana begins with merchant trade civic, but in the 600 A.D. they begin with redistribution. Since Ghana was know for its vast trade connections and merchant trade help a lot in building wangaras, merchant trade should be the initial option in both scenarios.
On Paragon (and maybe other difficulties, idk) but not on Regent, the +10% bonus against barbarians has the exact opposite effect, giving THEM +10% against your units. This applies only against barb units.
The tooltip is contradictory - your bonus is spelled out in green, but their strength is calculated as if it was -10%
The tooltip is contradictory - your bonus is spelled out in green, but their strength is calculated as if it was -10%
So the effect is correct but the tooltip is wrong?
The effect is wrong - instead of an even fight, barbarians get +10% (as far as I can tell, I doubt it's just a display issue)
this is also visible when viewing the calculated strengths of the two units before combat - it's displayed that the barbarians get the +10% to their strength
But it's Paragon, right? So barbarians should get the +10%.
oh, didn't know it was intended for Barbarians to get +10%.
In that case you're right, the only thing wrong is the green color of "+10% vs. Barbarians" in the tooltip.
I mean, honestly I am not aware what the exact Paragon settings are. But if it's a harder difficulty I would expect barbarians to be stronger.
Either way, I will look at the UI display.
Either way, I will look at the UI display.
Similar threads
