CFC Off Topic Turned Me Into a Fascist

Yeah, but I'm not sure everybody knows it. Some Europeans are always whining about how their native rasist squirrels are being outbread by American liberal squirrels (squirrels breed like crazy at public schools) but maybe not all members were aware?
 
Nationalisation is left-wing btw. Thatcher privatised industry in the 1980s whilst labour (left-wing) wanted to keep it.
 
No, it's not always and necessarily. Sometimes it could be, other times it isn't.
 
Any time property is nationalized, it happens under the left-wing economic banner. Period.
 
Nazi Germany, Venezuela, socialist healthcare in Europe...

Sweden, Norway, Spain, Zimbabwe...

Various other south and central american hellholes...

CCP, Pol Pot, Mao...

You name it. When the government is grabbing up private property... it is under a leftwing banner, complete with the buzz-phrases 'wealth reditribution', 'worker's rights' and 'think about the children'.

Countries today are considered socialist-leaning depending on the GDP percentage that is government controlled.

Right-wing is all free-markety... remember?

Once again, let's note that we are discussing economic wings, not social policy.
 
Socialist healthcare in Europe grabbed up private property?
 
Of course. Nationalizing hospitals and even doctors is grabbing private property, or at a minimum preventing it from occuring. Not to mention insurance companies, clinics, etc. All grabbed up by the big government. Face it: healthcare is big business and when the government grabs it, they are grabbing what would be or was private business and property.

If we socialize healthcare in the US, we will be grabbing private property... not creating something new.
 
I await Dachs or Cheezy pointing out about a zillion times this has been proven false.
Easiest one I can think of offhand was the British partial nationalization of the Suez Canal back in the 1870s. Done for, IIRC, foreign policy reasons, to extend British financial control over the khedive of Egypt (and stick it to the French :D).
 
Easiest one I can think of offhand was the British partial nationalization of the Suez Canal back in the 1870s. Done for, IIRC, foreign policy reasons, to extend British financial control over the khedive of Egypt (and stick it to the French :D).
That's cute and all, but it fails to conform with Ecofarm's preconceived notions about the world, therefore must be invalid.
 
extend British financial control
Government financial control = left wing.
 
Not all imperialism is economic.

Government control of the means of production = left wing. Period.

The right wing lets the market decide, remember?

This is simple, people. C'mon.


I laugh and laugh everytime some left-winger tries to tell me that left-wing economic policy is not authoritarian. It just shows how little they really understand politics.
 
This wasn't the means of production, it was a financial lever over the khedive so he'd do what the British wanted him to. "We'll pay off your loans, give us the canal, we own you."
 
Owning the canal is owning a means of production, because the canal brings in extensive revenue. It's no different than owning a factory, or Chavez grabbing a hotel.


Right wing economic policy would have privatized it... aka, let the market decide.
 
Owning the canal is owning a means of production, because the canal brings in extensive revenue. It's no different than owning a factory, or Chavez grabbing a hotel.


Right wing economic policy would have privatized it.
You are confusing a goal with a side effect.
 
Your confusing the act with the intention.

Nationalizing is left wing economic policy and is always justified under their banner. Why someone really does it is a different story, if we want to include alterior motives and conspiracy theory.

For instance, I would say that Chavez's nationalization is under the left-wing economic banner... but he is probably only doing it for personal power.
 
Your confusing the act with the intention.

Nationalizing is left wing. Why someone does it is a different story.
You are applying a standard that may or may not be true for one point in history to an entirely different point in history where it is irrelevant. By your standards, every single government in history is a left wing organization. America has been left wing ever since they ratified the Constitution because the USPS is run by the government. Replacing paid freelance colonels with state officers to recruit regiments, train troops, and command them is nationalization, so there goes most of Europe since the seventeenth century. You're distorting the definition of left wing so much that it becomes useless.
 
Back
Top Bottom