I analysed a game today (I lost) and it came up with this:
What does all this mean? When you CA a game, what do the figures look like for you?
What does all this mean? When you CA a game, what do the figures look like for you?
Chess.com's computer analysis
- Thread starter Flying Pig
- Start date
The computer plays through your game, giving each move a score. It also does its own search for that move. If the best move it finds gives a higher score than the move played in the game, then it adds a comment to the game that says inaccuracy, mistake, or blunder, and increments its total for that category.
The 3 categories are triggered by different amounts of gap between your move and the computer's. For example inaccuracy might be 0.1-0.25 points, mistake 0.25-0.5 points, and blunder >0.5 points. I'm not sure what the actual thresholds are, that was just a guess.
The stats are a lot less important than looking at the moves where the computer thought its move is better. I go through the analysis output and try to understand why the move actually played was inferior to the alternative.
The 3 categories are triggered by different amounts of gap between your move and the computer's. For example inaccuracy might be 0.1-0.25 points, mistake 0.25-0.5 points, and blunder >0.5 points. I'm not sure what the actual thresholds are, that was just a guess.
The stats are a lot less important than looking at the moves where the computer thought its move is better. I go through the analysis output and try to understand why the move actually played was inferior to the alternative.
Narz
keeping it real
I'm throughly unimpressed with chess.com's analysis engine & don't use it anymore.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/the-chess-analysis-engines-blunders
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/the-chesscom-analysis-engine-is-a-jerk
From the second thread ("the chess.com analysis engine is a jerk"
) :
ing.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/the-chess-analysis-engines-blunders
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/the-chesscom-analysis-engine-is-a-jerk
From the second thread ("the chess.com analysis engine is a jerk"
) :That had meesolom said:
ing.
Narz
keeping it real
On topic the best "figures" I ever got from a chess.com analyzed game is from this one.
Inaccuracies: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Mistakes: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Blunders: 0 = 0.0% of moves
That said, the game was cut short prematurely when my opponent went on a mass resigning spree. My endgames are generally fairly full of inaccuracies & often mistakes. Personally I find the distinctions not very accurate. I've recieved a "??" for a move which chess.com rates as .10 worse than it's best idea. Panzar's chessmaster analysis is significantly superior, besides being overly critical of not-that-bad moves chess.com's engine often misses the best lines.
Inaccuracies: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Mistakes: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Blunders: 0 = 0.0% of moves
That said, the game was cut short prematurely when my opponent went on a mass resigning spree. My endgames are generally fairly full of inaccuracies & often mistakes. Personally I find the distinctions not very accurate. I've recieved a "??" for a move which chess.com rates as .10 worse than it's best idea. Panzar's chessmaster analysis is significantly superior, besides being overly critical of not-that-bad moves chess.com's engine often misses the best lines.
Similar threads
- Locked
