Civ Snobs

Mulholland

Happy New Year!!!!
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,756
Location
Quebec
I was just wondering if anyone has encountered anybody in MP who fits this description. I'll try to recrate our echange.
I join a game named "2v2 expert" in multiplayer.

Civ snob 1: "are you good?"
Me: "Yeah I'm pretty good'
Civ Snob 2: "Choose the Aztecs or the French"
Me: "I've never played with either of those civs."
Civ snob 1: "Mulholland, you said you were good."
Me: "I am. I've played quite a bit."
Civ Snob 2: "I don't see how you could have played so long and not played with the two best civs."
Me: "I like the cultural boost at the beginning"
Civ Snob1: "what's up with these ****ing noobs?"
Me: "I DON'T appreciate anyone telling me what civ to play."
[Civsnob 1 and 2 than begin to bicker amongst themselves about the settings]
[Civ snob 2 leaves. I leave]

It really frustrates me that someone who percieves that he and his civ is the best can then dictate what civ his teammate plays. The noob comment was a bit of a stretch too I think.
Has anyone else had any encounters with Civ Snobs in MP?
Can anyone think of a better name than Civ Snob?
 
Just give them a little of this. :hammer: Talking is simply that. Give it to them on the field and say "scoreboard". They're punks and there are plenty of people on this site that you can feel comfortable playing a MP game with. BTW Jags are no match for axeman on flat ground.
 
They don't have a clue what they're talking about. Rome is way better than the French and Aztecs. :p
 
Why play the 'best' civs anyway?

Sounds like they need every advantage they can get. NOOOOOOBS!

You say 'I play Peter the great beacuse I'm too good to play Aztec!'
 
Bah I hate it when people thing there great and tell you how to play your games. You can tell the friends they have hate them :P
 
Should have told them, you don't play Aztec or French because it would be too easy then
 
Both Jaguars and Musketeers are the worst UU's in the game - so they should be ashamed of themselves. They must have been kidding!
 
I play Catherine...but everyone looks at me when I ask for horses...
 
meisen said:
You meed a lot of insecure jerks like that on the web. They use the anonimity of the web to act out their macho cowboy fantasies. They probably think they are compensating for very real failings of personality they are not mature enough yet to overcome. I've found the best way to deal with them is to ignore them and move on.
+1, especially in the games but not only. So don't get upset like that, it's not worth it.

BTW, a little tip : never say you're pretty good. Say that you've played some games before and show that you're pretty good. ;)
 
ShaLouZa said:
...BTW, a little tip : never say you're pretty good. Say that you've played some games before and show that you're pretty good. ;)


yup, what he said, its like poker, dont let em know what you got in your hand.;) and btw there is no best civ. every civ has its own unique thing.:)
 
781117.gif


Don't yell at me. :)

P.s. yes, I know the whole horse thing is not true, but it sure as hell is funny.
 
India is best of em' all. If you don't play them you are a noob :D
 
Hum... Could someone give me a clue ? Out of the cossacks thing, I don't see what you're talking about.
 
Real good players can play any Civ/leader, I play most games with everyone agreeing to random civ leaders.

CS
 
What about the civ snobs who advertise games as 2 v 2 expert? How does one classify themselves as an expert? :)
 
ShaLouZa said:
Hum... Could someone give me a clue ? Out of the cossacks thing, I don't see what you're talking about.

Theres a historically inaccurate rumor that Cathrine liked to have sexual intercourse with horses.
That is incorrect. It was not the horses she liked. It was the cavlry officers.
 
Back
Top Bottom