_alphaBeta_
King
Yes, it has been addressed, and thank goodness. This was a show-stopper for me since I don't use any kind of automation in this game. Long live micromanagement.
From the changelist:
-
Civilization 7 has been announced. For more info please check the forum here .
Civ4 BTS Patch v3.13 is up
- Thread starter MrDrizzt
- Start date
Yes, it has been addressed, and thank goodness. This was a show-stopper for me since I don't use any kind of automation in this game. Long live micromanagement.
From the changelist:
Cyrus_the_Great
Warlord
I finally installed the patch and looked forward to having the leaderheads fixed. To my surprize, I can now see the learderheads, but they are now static. I can live with that until I can upgrade my motherboard so I can upgrade my video card.
BeastMaster
Chieftain
didn't care for the patch. used Bhruic's unofficial patch source code and recompiled the dll. premature release from the devs! just my 2 cents.
Still no word from Firaxis on if they plan to fix their mistakes?
BoydofZINJ
Warlord
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 126
I may have missed it somewhere - but the unofficial patch... the AI were smarter? I almost feel like uninstalling the official patch and reloading just the unofficial!
jray
King
Bhruic's unofficial patch sits on top of the official one. It should only be used with 3.13. So your two choices are 3.02 + Solver's Unofficial patch, or 3.13 + Bhruic's Unofficial patch.
CivAgamemnon
King
Best make it 3.02, then, with solver's patch. 3.03 doesn't seem to do much good.
jagdtigerciv
Prince
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 468
FINALLY! The patch!
dalamb
Deity
With all the problems people mention with 3.13: Should I stick with 3.03 or update? The only problem with 3.03 that I notice is Civilopedia crashes; I only ever play single, and usually either at Noble or whatever a given month's GOTM uses.
TheWilltoAct
I am observe
Yea, I agree Horace. It seems justifiable to upgrade to 3.13 provided you use Bhruic's patch on top of it... probably closer to the definitive civ experience heh
I have vanilla Civ4 and BTS installed and the patch works fine for me so far running on a P4-1.6 with 512 MB RAM and a Radeon 9600 Pro-256 on WinXP Pro.
Load a saved game on huge map/marathon/18 civs at 1500 AD and that works fine as well.
I noticed that I can now trade any kind of resources with the AI, even those that they have already bought from me or those that they already own themselves and that is before any corporation was founded.
Really shouldn't get rid of the "glance" screen under diplomatic adviser as that was very useful. Now I have to go to each AI player and ask them what they think of someone from time to time. Bummer......
You guys talked about the Bhruic's patch, can someone post a link here? I try to search for it but couldn't find the link for details and download.
My thanks in advance.
Load a saved game on huge map/marathon/18 civs at 1500 AD and that works fine as well.
I noticed that I can now trade any kind of resources with the AI, even those that they have already bought from me or those that they already own themselves and that is before any corporation was founded.
Really shouldn't get rid of the "glance" screen under diplomatic adviser as that was very useful. Now I have to go to each AI player and ask them what they think of someone from time to time. Bummer......
You guys talked about the Bhruic's patch, can someone post a link here? I try to search for it but couldn't find the link for details and download.
My thanks in advance.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=246057
should be sticked... not sure why it isn't yet.
should be sticked... not sure why it isn't yet.
jray
King
Lots of people (including me) have been clamoring for a sticky for Bhruic's unofficial patch, but apparently the mods have their reasons for refraining. I guess it's not too surprising considering that Solver's unofficial patch wasn't stickied either. But I wholeheartedly agree, that it SHOULD be stickied! I just cringe to think of all those poor souls who try to play 3.13 without it. It's even worse than trying to playing 3.02 without Solver's patch... at least 3.02 wasn't filled with game-breaking bugs.
