i think more specialization is needed. Espionage is great but we need more of one civ tuning into the inner workings of the other civ. I've also been thinking of a new title program. Say you are running hereditary rule. You divide your empire into Kingdoms. You are then king of each one of those kingdoms, and your title would be King of York, which would be York and all the land with only culture from york in it. You can trade these titles to stop war or in normal treaty, and you can edit your kingdoms so multiple cities are in each one. You can also do other things, such as states or territories, or even colonies. I would like to see more in depth features for each time period, not justs units but the peoples intellect should change as well. Like, in the ancient age your people like war alot, then in the classical age an appretiation of the arts takes route, while the medieval age people tend to be much more religious and much more warlike. Then, peoples in the Renaisance prefer the arts again along with discovery and trade. The Industrial Revolution gets people thinking that there is a major difference between the classes, while in nations where the wealth is more spread out and not just in certain areas it really won't be much of a problem. In the modern and future ages, people tend to prefer democracies and freedoms as opposed to dictatorships and governments that are aligned along democracies are willing to take out freedom oppressing nations. We also need more events more often. I mean, stuff happens all the time and it always has. I also want to see the rise of some nations and the failure of others. I hate having a game where china gets a few lucky events or just a good goody hut win, they shouldn't be at the top for the entire game. Civs should have to mantain a thriving civilization throughout time. I generally prefer games where i set everything up for a late game rush. I just think things need to be more dynamic and not so strait lined.
