Civilization 5

[Camikaze]

Italy hasn't really been all that influential. Throughout its short and recent history, it has struggled through wars and occupation, and general civil strife. It isn't exactly the epitome of an important or powerful civilization.

 

[Weik]

There should be a civilization that represent the Italian Renaissance, and I think a generic Italian civ would be better than Milan, Venice, Florence or the Papal States.

 

[Öjevind Lång]

here's something I do think they should take the trouble to fix. In Civ II, if you didn't want a suggested city name, you told it to go away, and it never turned up again for the duration of that game. Now you have to keep telling the name to go away all the time, which is annoying. A minor thing, yes, but still an irritant and clearly something the developers could fix. They did so before.

And please stop calling Franz Kafka "Frank Kafka"! He has never, ever been known udner that name anywhere. Sounds like a jazz musician to me.

 

[tagteamchampion]

A couple of small things.

I would like more variety in the airforces rather than just fighter or bomber.
I would also like the ability to specifically target intercepting planes rather than just airstriking and being intercepted.

Canals are a must!

Expand a bit more on the random events on BTS. A wider variety of missions too.

Love Civ 4, and especially BTS, Civ 5 doesn't need to change that much in my opinion.

 

[mekkamekka]

Including ones that had high points but 'lost' historically. The Olmec, the Toltecs. The Viets. Fusang. Thai. Tibetans (once had a huge empire.) The Nubians.

Also, Earth scenarios should recognize the one time greatness of the Silk Road, once one of the most fascination and wealthy and culturally rich areas on Earth. The Khara Khitai. The Jurchen. The Gandharans. Earth scenarios tend to play out predicatably, while an alternate history where, say, the Gandharans end up lasting and spreading Buddhism over the earth would be something new. . . .

 

[DMOC]

What Civ V should do is allow an increased number of religions in proportion to the number of civilizations in play. In a 36-civ map, 7 religions alone just isn't going to cut it, especially if there are 6 continents and they all become either pagans or a one-religion-lovefest.

 

[Soda7777777]

Very true, and I dislike how if you're the most advanced civ you get all the religions. Religions should also have actual differences. Fall from Heaven 2 sorta does that, but they should make it more advanced. Also the random map should be better. I never get a planet that seems any bit realistic.

 

[jsweeney]

Very true, and I dislike how if you're the most advanced civ you get all the religions. Religions should also have actual differences. Fall from Heaven 2 sorta does that, but they should make it more advanced. Also the random map should be better. I never get a planet that seems any bit realistic.

i support this but the differences cannot be along stereotypical lines. Like when i play as aztecs and get most religions i find an old world which hates me and with strong allies/

 

[Öjevind Lång]

Including ones that had high points but 'lost' historically. The Olmec, the Toltecs. The Viets. Fusang. Thai. Tibetans (once had a huge empire.) The Nubians.

Also, Earth scenarios should recognize the one time greatness of the Silk Road, once one of the most fascination and wealthy and culturally rich areas on Earth. The Khara Khitai. The Jurchen. The Gandharans. Earth scenarios tend to play out predicatably, while an alternate history where, say, the Gandharans end up lasting and spreading Buddhism over the earth would be something new. . . .

I'd like to see the Hittites back. They were very important for centuries and were the ones who discovered how to temper iron.

I agree about the Silk Road. It might be something to civs with different trade goods could agree on having, to the befit of both, and to civs lying inbetween.

 

[superbob]

i think that there should be genocide wiping certain people out of your cities

cities can rebel and form there own nation

realistic economy

disease

natural disasters

aliens

better and less predictable ai militaries

more types of goernment

more techs

future techs effecting more than just health and happiness of cities but also faster
production speed, units become more powerful or new units instead of just leaving
the units just as is

a more realistic global warming or even no global warming

nulear weapons have the ability to destroy cities

an upgraded nuclear missile that comes with another technology

the non-proliferation treaty is'nt a resolution but a treaty that will keep the two nations making the agreement to not use nuclear weapons unless it has been used against them

units continue to lose health the longer they stay inside nucler waste

nuclear waste goes away eventualy

a more accurate turn by turn time basis

the ability to create your on natian before a game

you can create your own world wonders

cruiser missiles from civ3

you can move move both cruiser and nuclear missiles but only with a missile truck

galleys can go into the ocean but have a high chance of sinking

subs arent so defenseless

there are transport vechles such as a jeep that units can use to go faster

some airplanes can transport units

you can send production to other cities

you can lose culture

you can bomb specific buildings buildings

 

[superbob]

and tectonic plates

 

[Emperor Kabal]

They can change the State Property civic to fit more realistic aspects in the next installment. Seriously Civ4 was pretty left to me. Who want's Communism? Obviously ignorant people that eat out the hands of bureaucrats that obfuscate the issues.

They can add a realistic economic model. Natural disasters, diseases, pandemics, resource shortages, post-apocalyptic scenarios so the game can continue even after everyone has been nuked to oblivion. A Real World scenario where every civ as their authentic architecture, units and cultural boundaries set in ancient, medival, classic, industrial and modern times.

 

[Soda7777777]

They can change the State Property civic to fit more realistic aspects in the next installment. Seriously Civ4 was pretty left to me. Who want's Communism? Obviously ignorant people that eat out the hands of bureaucrats that obfuscate the issues.

What do you mean by that? Hmmmm?

 

[Naokaukodem]

What do you mean by that? Hmmmm?

He means that there should not be Communism because in the real world nowadays NOBODY use it! Probably an American who does not know where China is.

By the way, there's still a Communist party in France, and I'm sure in numerous other countries.

 

[Soda7777777]

He means that there should not be Communism because in the real world nowadays NOBODY use it! Probably an American who do not know where China is.

By the way, there's still a Communist party in France, and I'm sure in numerous other countries.

Yeah, and the second largest part in Europe is the Party of European Socialist.

 

[Naokaukodem]

Yeah, and the second largest part in Europe is the Party of European Socialist.

Well, Socialism is pretty different from Communism...

 

[Soda7777777]

Well, Socialism is pretty different from Communism...

I realized that, I am in fact a Socialist.

 

[AveiMil]

In Civilization 5 you should be able to run false flag operations like burning of the Reichstag and 9/11.

 

[Naokaukodem]

I realized that, I am in fact a Socialist.

Then we are two.

 

[superbob]

there should still be communism though
its still a style of government even the u.s has a communist party