Cortez the Conqueror

[Acepox]

Hm, Francesco Pizarro would also be a great option

 

[Patine]

Hm, Francesco Pizarro would also be a great option

Yeah, he would be a completely and unrelated alternative with none of the same issues and complaints about Cortez.


Moderator Action: Trolling removed. leif

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

You've been unable to voice exactly why you are so vehemently opposed to conquistadors, on which I am not, in fact, fixated. I just don't suffer hypocrites.

Why have conquistador leaders, when you could just have a conquistador unique unit?

 

[BuchiTaton]

Plot twist, instead of Hernán Cortés we get either:
* Malintzin/Marina
* Huehue Xicoténcatl
* Gonzalo Guerrero
* Vasco De Quiroga

 

[ehecatzin]

I would like to +1 Gonzalo Guerrero,

 

[Henri Christophe]

I feel like having Cortez as an Exploration age leader is a bad idea.

I agree, Spanish conquerors shouldn't be endorsing in a game as civilizations. They aren't someone who we should have proud, but instead, shame.

 

[Acepox]

I agree, Spanish conquerors shouldn't be endorsing in a game as civilizations. They aren't someone who we should have proud, but instead, shame.

That is so extremely racist. You would not say the same of the dozens of other violent, albeit non-white conquerors who have featured in Civ.

Moderator Action: Trolling removed. leif

 

[leif erikson]

Moderator Action: Have removed the trolling. If you feel someone is trolling or flaming you, please report the post and let staff handle it.