1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

crossbow man overpowed?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by apocalypse105, Mar 9, 2012.

  1. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    Is it jsut me or are crosbowman overpowered?

    I mean previouslt patch it had 6 strenght and 12 range strenght

    WIch is balanced

    But now its 15 range and 10 strenght(melee strenght)


    I don' t mind the extra range strenght it was a little bit on the weak side especially against longswordsman however 10 melee strenght really?


    Pikeman can't compete against these units, longswordsman are stronger in melee but with proper flanking or terain modifiers they as worse as pikeman in close combat...

    And even on open terain massive crosbowman beat swordsman because the longswordsman gets seriously damaged when atacking a crosbowman in melee combat..

    ANd knights well they actually are usefull against crosbowman however they come pretty late an you usally will have horsemen at the time you're opponent will have crosbowman ...
    and having a single flanking bonus or a terain bonus let you do enough dammage on mellee to kill him


    Anybody else thinx crosbowman are way overpowered especially on multiplayer.

    BUt not to mention against the AI I have won so much wars with only crosbowman
     
  2. Gucumatz

    Gucumatz JS, secretly Rod Serling

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,181
    On multiplayer I have noticed people have more and more been rushing crossbows. In a team game of mine my partner barely had units but had a high production capital/high pop capital. Anyways opponent rushed him with longswords/muskets only to be crushed my him spamming crossbows and holding forested ground. A couple of well placed crossbows took out the sneak attack easily. Its amazing how good they are in a good player on multi.
     
  3. CivilizedPlayer

    CivilizedPlayer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    222
    Yeah the 10 defense is really high. Genghis Khan charged my undefended line of crossbowman with horsemen, and got unceremoniously slaughtered. Every horseman attacked a crossbowman, and not a single crossbowman died. And the next turn I finished them off.
    With Cho ku nos, you can conquer half the map in a single era using them. I used 3 of them with a single swordsman, and conquered 3 or 4 cities in a single turn each (with a slight tech advantage). I think the main problem is that 10 defense. You hardly have to protect them, and it's frustrating when I charge an undefended crossbowman but somehow take more damage than it does. Ranged units are supposed to lose (badly!) in melee combat.
     
  4. snarzberry

    snarzberry Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,240
    Location:
    New Zealand
    They're good units but I think they need to be this good as they are one of the alternate paths to take if you get screwed with iron access. Also the AI likes to build them so a nerf will work against them more than the human player. The more common units to use on attack in that era are the sword/longsword path, which is better and favoured by players unless they can't get any iron. Overall, yeah crossbows can be nasty but I'm pretty happy with their strength.
     
  5. Silverfuturist

    Silverfuturist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    684
     
  6. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
     
  7. Silverfuturist

    Silverfuturist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    684
     
  8. rkelle7

    rkelle7 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    90
    Crossbowman are overpowered...nuff said. J/k. Seriously though I think realism is important to think about in civ to make it fun. Let's say for instance a crossbowman does have a sword and we bar what Silverfurist said...swordsman practice with swords. Crossbowman would have to practice with both. I don't mind the ranged strength as much as I mind the combat. Maybe 14-16 ranged strength and 6-8 combat strength would be reasonable.

    -AwesoMe
     
  9. Hammer Rabbi

    Hammer Rabbi Chieftain GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    USA
    6 combat str would make them exceedingly weak. 8 combat strength (from the 10 they have now) would be the only middle ground i could agree on. they could be 1-shot by knights more often.

    (just came off a frustrating reload when my conquistadors couldn't 1-shot a crossbow to save their lives, literally).

    i dont know about the mp OP (dont play much mp yet), but for the most part crossbows save my keister in the right terrain with the right promos. so i definitely like them as they are.
     
  10. vonbach

    vonbach Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    312
    They are overpowered. I've stopped every assault I've seen
    with 2 crossbows and a city.
     
  11. Tabarnak

    Tabarnak Pô Chi Min

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,703
    Location:
    Québec
    Agree for 8 :c5strength:
     
  12. The_Quasar

    The_Quasar Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    799
    Certainly no lower than 8, but noting that snarzberry has a very valid point with the alternative for iron.
     
  13. antoca

    antoca Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    98
    Location:
    Russia
    Crossbowmen lose all promotions when you upgrade them into the melee (gunpowder) unit. So they are not overpowered, but underpowered.
     
  14. Silverfuturist

    Silverfuturist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    684
    Crossbowman keep promotions not related to ranged attack. For crossbow units I plan on upgrading, I select siege, cover, etc which will carry over to rifles.

    I have used longbows and chu-ko-nus to finish off mech infantry... something with 1 HP will die to any ranged attack. Chu-ko-nus can finish off any unit with 2 hp left, and if they have the extra range promotion they never go out of style.

    The argument... that they are underpowered because they don't carry over all promotions... wouldn't that mean that keshiks are underpowered because they don't keep promotions when upgrading to cavalry?
     
  15. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    Yes and not to mention that in the expansion pack they are going to get a other path of upgrade they are going to upgrade to a other range unit.


    A melee unit should have a negatif thing because range units are so powerfull with 1 unit per tile having low melee srenght balance everything perfectly.
     
  16. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    IF you don't have iron you have plenty of alternatives for devence.

    Knights are amazing on defence they can atack and hide back in the city or move away on rouds they have 18 combat strenght so they easy beat the longswordsman.


    Pikeman fortified on a hill can hold off some longswordsman with crosbowman behind them.


    But crosbowman by them self just spamming them out shouldn't be able to handle a atack of swordsman units


    Do you see the balance here? A no resource unit that is stronger then a unit with a resoucre.

    Instead you need to use alternative ways to defend you'reself wich is possible
     
  17. _hero_

    _hero_ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    603
    The expansion pack is probably going to rebalance combat values.
     
  18. joncnunn

    joncnunn Senior Java Wizard Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    8,383
    Location:
    Missouri
    I guess if the Crossbow is considered the best normal unit for its time frame, then that would make the Chinese UU the best one in the game. (2 attacks per turn).
     
  19. bhavv

    bhavv Glorious World Dictator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,258
    Why only propose a strength decrease of 2?

    How about 9 strength and 14 ranged? And also buff swordsmen to 12 strength, and reduce pikes to 9.

    In Civ 4 you were mostly screwed without strategic resources. In Civ V they are meaningless when you can dominate far too easily with pikes and crossbows.
     
  20. vonbach

    vonbach Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    312
    Or you could not lower the combat strength and give
    the crossbows a set up time. That would balance them.
     

Share This Page