I almost never research divine right. I don't care about the spiral minaret or versailles, the AI can have them. I think NOT having it is a valuable diplomatic tool. Instead of having tech hogs like mansa and zara coming begging for your newest tech all the time and either giving it to them or taking a diplo hit, they'll say "hey gwynnja, check this out: I'll give you divine right and you give me rifling and 8 billion gold. sound like a deal?" then you can just say it ain't happening with no penalty. it's rare to have a tech as completely useless as divine right that you can always just say no thanks and not lose points, but if they don't have something they think you want then they're bound to try to get you to gift it to them.
-
We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.
Divine Right; a new use?
- Thread starter Gwynnja
- Start date
Moxxa
Warlord
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2006
- Messages
- 241
I agree. The one time in several hundred games of civ I researced DR, I regretted it.
One situation I would research it is if I was pursuing a Religous Economy strategy in which you build the Spiral Minaret, University of Sankore, Apostolic Palace, and the Sistine Chapel. I've heard that this can be a very powerful strategy because all of your state religion's buildings net you 2 gold, 2 flasks, 5 culture, and 2 hammers on top of what the building already gives you. GO RAMSES!
One situation I would research it is if I was pursuing a Religous Economy strategy in which you build the Spiral Minaret, University of Sankore, Apostolic Palace, and the Sistine Chapel. I've heard that this can be a very powerful strategy because all of your state religion's buildings net you 2 gold, 2 flasks, 5 culture, and 2 hammers on top of what the building already gives you. GO RAMSES!
The move you describe is anti-diplo.
If you desperatively need one more AI to vote for you for DV, there's nothing better than a demand.
Or you go culture/space and don't exactly have an army (smth like 2 archers / city
) a demand is very welcome as well.
But of course if you're strong, those demands really suck (but then they're less frequent).
For this "strategy" you can also use techs like HBR, archery btw.
If you desperatively need one more AI to vote for you for DV, there's nothing better than a demand.
Or you go culture/space and don't exactly have an army (smth like 2 archers / city
) a demand is very welcome as well.But of course if you're strong, those demands really suck (but then they're less frequent).
For this "strategy" you can also use techs like HBR, archery btw.
r_rolo1
King of myself
See it the other way around: AI loves DR by some esoterical reason ( probably because it founds a religion and has 2 wonders ) , so that tech makes a excelent bargaining chip.
The move you describe is anti-diplo.
If you desperatively need one more AI to vote for you for DV, there's nothing better than a demand.
Or you go culture/space and don't exactly have an army (smth like 2 archers / city
But of course if you're strong, those demands really suck (but then they're less frequent).
For this "strategy" you can also use techs like HBR, archery btw.
I rarely research HBR before i can get it done in just a few turns, and I often wait until just prior to either machinery or feudalism for archery.
futurehermit
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 5,724
I don't often go for DR, but when I do I don't regret it. The two wonders are good, especially versailles, and yeah you can trade it for a lot of good stuff, even after the wonders are built and the religion is founded 
Crowqueen
Token forum woman
I go for the Spiral Minaret. The underpinning of my game is cash, and more often than not I never adopt Free Religion until after Mass Media, so the money rolls in and my empire balloons. Versailles is cool too (particularly on Terra maps) but more often than not State Property is a late game priority so Versailles and the FP often never get built. But Spiral Minaret is necessary for the Civ running the AP because of the income bonus that I presume you get from everyone else's state religion buildings as well. In one of my games the whole world was, for a time, Buddhist, and there was my gold mine spiraling up into the sunset in Athens. Made a huge difference to a non-Financial/Organised leader.
The income from the SM, like the hammers from the AP, are generated directly by the buildings. Unlike the AP, the gold only comes from buildings of the SM owner.
Can someone explain to me why does AI give so much value to the DR? It is a dead end tech, that enables 2 wonders and a religion, once it is discovered and wonders are built, it is absolutelly uselless. So why do I get thos "fair" trade proposition from AI: like we give you DR and you give us some modern or future era tech that costs 2 to 3 times the amount of beakers and throw in some gold on top too???!!! I seriously think there is a bug involved.
If I have a largish empire, I try to get DR first because I want versailles. Once versailles is almost complete it's still a great trading chip.
If I'm behind on tech's I might research it to try and trade for techs I need since the AI loves it so much.
If Neither of the above apply I tend to ignore it for quite awhile.
If I'm behind on tech's I might research it to try and trade for techs I need since the AI loves it so much.
If Neither of the above apply I tend to ignore it for quite awhile.
Crowqueen
Token forum woman
That's not a bug. It's in the hope you might not notice what a raw deal it is.
Re the SM - oh well, worth a try. I've been playing based on that assumption but never mind. It's still a good way to bolster your cashflow nonetheless.
LightSpectra
me autem minui
The first person to research Divine Right should get a Great Prophet.
Monkeyfinger
Deity
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 2,002
Your loss. Pretty stupid mistake though.
I suppose.
I guess I'd rather push towards liberalism and build a huge army to prepare for the late game rifle/cannon vassaling spree.I agree. The one time in several hundred games of civ I researced DR, I regretted it.
One situation I would research it is if I was pursuing a Religous Economy strategy in which you build the Spiral Minaret, University of Sankore, Apostolic Palace, and the Sistine Chapel. I've heard that this can be a very powerful strategy because all of your state religion's buildings net you 2 gold, 2 flasks, 5 culture, and 2 hammers on top of what the building already gives you. GO RAMSES!
OH YEAH. I go for AP whenever I can, and, if I get it, Sankore and SM. Sistine Chapel is just gravy if CV is not your goal.
In my experience the Sistine Chapel is more useful for creating cultural pressure in the Medieval-Renaissance period than for a cultural victory. It helps of course with a cultural victory, but cathedrals and corporations generate far more culture.
AnitaGaribaldi
Warlord
The AI is really stupid. In one of my games Cyrus built the Spiral Miranet while running Free Religion, and it didn't change its civics after the wonder was built.
