Do you choose or put random

I randomize everything, and yes indeed; it sometimes add to the challenge.
Like my present emperor game, where I am Egypt on an archipelago map with seemingly 80% water and two of the rival civs are Vikings and Dutch... :cry:
 
I normally go for random civs, though sometimes I get fed up of certain civs ('oh great the Aztecs have declared war on me yet again....' kinda thing) thus choose my oppenants.

Maps I always specify.
 
I choose and try to mix opponent (no scientific trait..) so I have 1 or 2 techs that any other have. It could be 1 or 2 trades early (usually to have potery if I don't ^^)

Anyway, at emperor level or less, I used to let random everywhere: my civ, opponents, world, barb..etc
 
I thinks theres a bug when you play random: you always get civs from the american continent (Americans, Mayan, Iraquious etc). I think this is in a thread somewere to.

Its to bad because I like the Idea of not nowing wich opponents your going to face.
 
normally random for enemies, but I select the planet type and my civ
although I did sort of cheat in my current game. earth map for RAR and I made myself america and selected my opponents choosing civs that would not be in north or south america
 
I choose the world settings and my own civ but randomise my targets, er, AI civs.

I figure tailoring the world to my civ (lots of desert for agri civs, lots of water for sea civs, etc.) counters the AI's "unfortified obsolete unit on grassland +1000% defence bonus!
 
I tend to pick a few, and random the rest. If I'm playing as Germany, I want a France and Russia in the game. If I'm the US, I want Russians in the game. Romans need Cartaginians. That kind of thing.
 
I usually play random, unless I want to see one civ I haven't seen in a long while.
 
Just started playing random civ opponents. Next game will also use random for myself. I find it's just to frustrating trying to select who I want to be and who I want to play against. In the end I don't think I matters much and I will get experience playing civs I have so far avoided.

rainmaker
 
I normaly use all random including my civ. But after reading this thread it occured to me that it might be fun to pick the civ I just played as an opponent. Think I will do that from now on.
Know your enemys. ;)
 
I randomize the terrain, climate, age ... but usually pick landmass ... as I like to play an island hopping campaign ... but other times pangea when i go crazy wonder building ...

OT ... Like the avitar moondoggi
 
Hmm...funny. I've always picked my opponents. I like to know who I'm up against, usually. You can say it's more of a challenge otherwise, but that's really how I've always played the game, ever since I first played the original Civilization back in 1993.

For me, I tend to choose first, randomize later. When I became a hardcore Civilization 2 veteran to the point where I could play on Deity and win every time I played, I started randomizing, just because it had become too easy (though it really didn't make much of a difference anyway by that point). The only real difference between civilizations were their aggressiveness and tech preferences, and for an expert like me it didn't make a difference.

Heh, then I play CivIII for the first time on Regent and I get my butt kicked. :P It wasn't until PTW came out that I advanced to Monarch and then to Emperor. Just recently I've advanced to Demigod (and I'll have to admit this site was sort of the catalyst that brought that about).
 
Almost always random, except for world size and barbarians.
 
Back
Top Bottom