ew0054
Troll Extraordinaire
I have Windows XP Professional with SP2 ready to install... I should be good, no?
That's nothing. I had at one time:JesusOnEez said:There was a time when I had a multi-boot system with;
MS-DOS 6.22
Windows 3.11
Windows Me
BeOS
Redhat Linux
ew0054 said:I thought I only need to install Windows XP once... am I missing something?
That's what I meant. boot.ini is the configuration file for ntldr. You'll need to edit it to allow booting Windows 3.11. I don't remember how to do it, though.JesusOnEez said:Chairman Meow confirmed my suspicions with XP not detecting a Windows 3.11 installation. You can play with ntldr as he suggest, but as long as XP is installed somewhere other than C: (where Windows 3.11 is), you can then edit boot.ini and add Windows 3.11 as a boot menu option.
Yes. It definitely will not run ideally. It will not recognize all of your RAM. Also, any program that tries to determine the speed of your processor will likely be confused by it (I once ran a system info tool in Win31 on a 2.4GHz processor, and it reported it as -1MHz.) If you have an Ethernet card made after 2000, you will not be able to find a driver for it. You might get lucky and find a working driver for your sound card, but I wouldn't hold my breath. And 640x480 is probably the best you'll get out of your graphics card. Basically, the only way to truly run vintage software is on a vintage computer. Besides, the vast majority of Win31 software still runs in Windows XP, or at least in Windows 98. There's not really any need to install Windows 3.1 to run its software. Now, you can still install it just for the fun of it, though.Solver said:Good luck with that. Getting Windows 3.1 (which I really liked back then) to run on modern hardware is going to be quite a challenge.
Indeed you are correct. Virtual PC, VMWare, and qemu (all of which are now free-as-in-beer) would all work far better than trying to run Windows 3.1 on new hardware. I don't know if anyone else noticed your comment, but I didn't ignore it...Comraddict said:As I said, but nobody cared, best way is to run it is in Microsoft Virtual
PC. The virtual hardware is bit older, and 100% supported by Windows
3.1 (both video and network cards
Chairman Meow said:And Comraddict has probably the best advice to your situation. There are
many good emulation/virtualization programs out there. The one I use is
qemu. Also, depending on what you need to run (specifically, if what you
need to run is a DOS program), then you might want to consider Dosbox.
Chairman Meow said:Right now, I hate Microsoft more than you can possibly imagine, because I had typed up a long, detailed response to answer your question, and then Internet Explorer spontaneously refreshed the page, wiping out everything I had typed.
Seven words...Leatherneck said:One word ...
Firefox.![]()