(_o_) said:Nice map. Could be a little bigger. I miss the huts. How can I add the huts like in the original 18 CIV non Warlord huge map?
Thx,
(_o_)
romelus said:aztecs always take out the americans. maybe it's just a case of monty over building military. but americans have iron and swordmen, yet they can't hold off strength 5 jags, hmmm.
Pantastic said:You might want to edit it and switch the American leader to Washington, he's a bit more militaristic than Roosevelt and his traits are better for a semi-isolated start (extra health and happy help a lot). Just open the file with a text editor, find where it says:
LeaderType=LEADER_FRANKLIN_ROOSEVELT
and change it to:
LeaderType=LEADER_WASHINGTON
Pantastic said:You might want to try starting the Celts in SE asia between China and India, it's obviously not historical but puts a check on both of their expansions.
tahnkout said:to romelus: well in my opinion the best starting location is france's. when you change the scenario to "no city razing" then you will have Berlin, Madrid, Rome, Celts and perhaps Athens and Istanbul conquered! It leads to overexpansion in the early game but by reducing your research to %60-%50 can do you no harm because you will have the same research capacity similar to the value with one city at %100. By growing and waiting, I'm sure you will succeed... By the way, France has two powerful goods: Stone and Marble and with Louis (Wonder Building speed ++), France will be inevitable... In my game London revolted in order to join me... heheheh...
I agree with the Inca starting location. Nothing can be done to those lads. They are a failure... (unfortunately)