lachiendupape said:true but i guess it's more of the lumping in of the Irish that I did not like, they have not been part fo Great britain ever as far as I know
Well...in some ways, the Irish have been part of Great Britain, but when one gets into these technical arguments over what to call the islands in the north of Western Europe and the countries and people on them, it's worth remembering that "Great Britain" technically only refers to the largest island in the group, as well as the kingdom that was formed by the unification of the Crowns of Scotland and England into a single title. Thus, the Irish have been a part of "Great Britain" in the sense that the Scots were originally an Irish Celt tribe that migrated to what is not known as Scotland. Other than that though, Ireland and the Irish have been a part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (which ceased to exist when Ireland, minus Ulster, became independent, and instead became the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), and to this day Ireland remains a part of the British Isles, which is the conventional name for the group of islands off the north coast of France (some Irish take issue with the name as suggesting that Ireland is still part of Britain, but it is worth remembering that the UKoGBaNI, like America and the Netherlands, was named after its geographical location, not the other way round). Also, prior to Anglo-Saxon migration to the island of Great Britain, the Brythonic Celts made up the vast majority of people on the British Isles, and there wasn't much of a political or nationalistic distinction between a Brythonic Celt from what is now England and one from what is now Ireland, so when Speaking about the Pre-anglo-saxon peoples, it is not (normally) considered at all offensive or inconsiderate to refer to the Celts in Great Britain and Ireland as "Britons" collectively.