ETA for 1.0?
- Thread starter OneBinary
- Start date
- Status
Cammagno
King
Well, if you are speaking of 1.0 vs. 0.16, yes, some good stuff added
if you are speaking of 1.0 vs. last internal version taken from SVN, no, only small things will be added before 1.0 release.
Not sure, but I think that being it released in a few days, it'll better to postpone the 1.0 to wait for it and fix any compatibility problem.
Things that may be interesting from the list of changes:
#####
Added ability to override modular XML loading in mod ini file
Improved Espionage screen (by Almightix)
Added city zoom to event popup
Exposed CvCity::AI_AvoidGrowth() to Python
Added ability to save cities, improvements, and resources as nifs from in game
Added Solver's events
Different unit artstyles can have different buttons
New button art for event plot indicator
#####
OneBinary
Warlord
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2005
- Messages
- 132
Sorry, yes was talking about changes from 0.16 to 1.0Well, if you are speaking of 1.0 vs. 0.16, yes, some good stuff added
if you are speaking of 1.0 vs. last internal version taken from SVN, no, only small things will be added before 1.0 release.
EmperorFool
Deity
Ooh, I missed this one when reading the list. This will be a definite collision (I didn't see any others) requiring testing. We include a whole new screen based on Almightix's version, so it should just override the new one as well.
EmperorFool
Deity
I'm tempted to release 1.0 this weekend, with or without 3.13. It looks like there will be no changes that affect BUG in 3.13, so why wait?
Having said that, I'm hoping to be rather busy this weekend for unrelated reasons. What is the availability of the rest of the team? Alerum has been handling the releases (packing, installer, etc) so far.
Having said that, I'm hoping to be rather busy this weekend for unrelated reasons. What is the availability of the rest of the team? Alerum has been handling the releases (packing, installer, etc) so far.
alerum68
Priest of Hiroshima
Saturday is a bad day for me, but I can work on it Sunday. Is when I was planning to do the screen shots, so I think I'll get the shots done, then put out 1.0. Now so I'm clear on this, we are NOT going to put the BUG mod into the FBUG Mod, but instead require they be downloaded separately? For the record, I dont' want to be the one to field the questions about how come they don't have smilies in their score.
Cammagno
King
Yes, there are, at least one... me
But the main reason is that BUG is a small mod to download, while FBUG is big.
And not everybody have broadband... I don't know how thinks are in USA or elsewhere, but for example here in Italy broadband is under 50%.
Cammagno
King
No problem about this, we only have to make clear (I did it in the readmes (I hope), you can do it in the home page) that FBUG is a stand-alone add-on of BUG mod. They can use it on its own (as they can do with the BUG Mod) but if they want all the features of the BUG project, they have to install the FBUG add-on over the BUG mod.
In any case, I'm not against a third pack including both BUG and FBUG if you think that it will be useful to users (I think that the other 2 are enough, but hey, the BUG'motto is "the more options, the better", so...
). But IMHO it has to be a simple install pack that puts together the original files and docs of the 2 mods, and it has to be be named in a way that makes clear that it is NOT the FBUG, but BUG+FBUG.- Status
Similar threads
