Extraordinarily bad webpages

Ugh, what the hell is that? Well, there's really no reason for an economics professor to be good at Web design.
 
Thaks, Wolf! You crashed my computer! I should have knew to cancel it when the bottom of the screen said 465 items to load after 3 minutes. What a train wreck!

For a more safe experience, here is a partial screenshot.
 
Just jerkin yer gherkin, Wolf. I saw most of it before my monitor decided saw all it could take. :lol:
 
And it seems that that woman is behind that website. Can't she realize what horror she had created?
 

I showed that to my coison, and he said he actually knows the guy.

Although I have been a sincere Christian for most of my life, http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/ is really over the edge......

Catholic priests are evil? America is godless and Communist? Good old hymns that sound like a baby crying (Sorry, I have specific tastes about music, and my hate towards .midi format just took on to a new level...)? Feminism is a crime? 666 is Secretary Rice? Public Schools are Evil? The New International Version is Evil? The central bak is evil? You idiots, it was John Calvin's theology that helped institute capitalism...

These guys just gave me enough reasons to never step foot in an American Protestan Church again...
That is why you and all the people like you will go to hell in 2012 when the rapture comes I'm I'm glad that you people will no longer pollute our earth and preach satan's word. :D
 
Catholic priests are evil? America is godless and Communist? Good old hymns that sound like a baby crying (Sorry, I have specific tastes about music, and my hate towards .midi format just took on to a new level...)? Feminism is a crime? 666 is Secretary Rice? Public Schools are Evil? The New International Version is Evil? The central bak is evil? You idiots, it was John Calvin's theology that helped institute capitalism...

These guys just gave me enough reasons to never step foot in an American Protestan Church again...

Ann Coulter would probably agree with them, though. Unless she is Catholic (idk)
 

Agreed.

Unspoil for ranting ;)
Spoiler :
originated at a common center in southeastern Europe on the Baltic. This would be close to the Ararat range.
yeah, Northeastern europe on the baltic is about as close to the Ararat range as the UK is to Greece. :rolleyes:

"It is a common error to think of man's existence in terms of recorded history, Historical records go back to about 3000 B.C., but this is only a small fraction of the time man has lived on earth."
"Recorded history is no more than six thousand years old, whereas human beings have been making history ever since they have been on this earth, a period believed to be about one million years."
fail for using quotes to disprove their own ideas.

Prior to a certain point several thousand years ago, there was no trace of man having ever existed. After that point, civilization, writing, language, agriculture, domestication, and all the rest—suddenly exploded into intense activity!
humans =/= civilization

The various radiodating techniques could be so inaccurate that mankind has only been on earth a few thousand years.
lol, wut?

"Only six or seven thousand years ago . . civilization emerged, enabling us to build up a human world."
again, humans =/= civilization.

Evolutionary estimates of the age of the earth have constantly changed and lengthened with the passing of time. (It currently stands at 5 billion years.) But the scientific evidence remains constant and, as new authentic evidence emerges, it only fastens down the dates even more firmly. It all points to a beginning for our planet, about 6,000 years ago. Some may see it as 7,000 to 10,000 years, but the evidence points most distinctly toward a date of about 4000 B.C. for the origin of our planet. The evidence for a recent earth is scientifically solid.
Oh my, you accidentally misspelt "against" as "for".
The earliest man is said, by the evolutionists, to have existed one or two million years old. Yet, they add quite emphatically, that he "stopped evolving" about 100,000 years ago.

—Why then do we not have 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and remains of all kinds? But we do not. The reason is the Bible is right and the evolutionists are wrong.
What a solid reason.
Also, humans stopped physically evolving =/= humans stopped behaviourally evolving
The God of heaven created our world about 6,000 years ago. Then, about 2348 B.C., a gigantic Flood covered the earth. Keeping in mind that we are dealing with very ancient events, all the evidence can be reconciled with these figures.
"All the evidence can be reconciled with these figures."
In the mind of a mentally ******** 3-year-old, maybe.
Certainly not while using any semblance of logic and reason.
 
Back
Top Bottom