FailedReality's Pitboss (1st - Vanilla)

[failedreality]

Since we are on an 18 hour timer I would think 9 hours would be a good rule

 

[Sonnybonds]

check the log
Prove It
how the hell can you say I DM'd you first..

Did I attack?
Or is this just a diversion or an excuse

on the year 800 AD you double turned me. Check the logs. If you make a move, declare war and finish a nother turn, thats a double turn

http://www.civstats.com/viewplayer.php?gameid=553&playernum=1

http://www.civstats.com/viewplayer.php?gameid=553&playernum=9

 

[Sonnybonds]

Whats about the rest of the game? Do we have a no Double turn rule or not?

I was for a no DM rule but since everybody is DM i m not so sure anymore.

 

[bbfrancis]

DM would imply using a DM to an advantage in war.

 

[failedreality]

on the year 800 AD you double turned me. Check the logs. If you make a move, declare war and finish a nother turn, thats a double turn

http://www.civstats.com/viewplayer.php?gameid=553&playernum=1

http://www.civstats.com/viewplayer.php?gameid=553&playernum=9

ok so where did I double move you in war time?
ah yes you said 800...

can you prove that the first login I did anything..
And how can I double move when the turn didnt change..?

you can only move once per turn.....!!!!!

The turn didnt change therefore I didn't double move on you

 

[Sonnybonds]

ok so where did I double move you in war time?
ah yes you said 800...

can you prove that the first login I did anything..
And how can I double move when the turn didnt change..?

you can only move once per turn.....!!!!!

The turn didnt change therefore I didn't double move on you

OK let me explain word for word maybe you undersand.

in 780 I finished my turn
then you finished your turn

in 800 your finished your turn first
then i finished my turn.

Thats what people call a double move.
it doenst matter if you declared war in 780 or 800. Its still a double move.

 

[Mauer]

Was there combat? If not then I'd think his "double move" would benefit you as he'd have shown his hand.

 

[failedreality]

I think you call that a double move..
If I did not attack you or we were at war how can you claim for this to be a double move..

you know what forget it, your not going to get it as this is the 2nd time this has happened in this game..

 

[failedreality]

In fact im logged in right now and it says I declared @ 800..

 

[Sonnybonds]

failedreality your the one who is complainging about DM.
So why do you make one your self???

 

[Mauer]

I think the point he's making Sonny is that he didn't DM. He wasn't at war with you on 780, but was on 800.

 

[Sonnybonds]

So to keep the upside of double turns while eliminating (or at least minimizing) the downside, the rule is that if you are at war with another player (or are about to go to war with them, eg. sneak attacks) then you mustn't take two turns before they've had a chance to take one, or in other words you cannot go after them in one turn and before them in the next.

The Oobs rules for DM

 

[Levgre]

do you think you'll decide to finish the turn, Gozer?

 

[Gozer]

Do you think you'll change your firewall settings so that I can connect, Levgree?

 

[Levgre]

well, there's nothing else I can change on my firewall, just is some strange conflict between you and I. Am not connected anymore though.

 

[oyzar]

It is just the client used for connecting people together with civ that blows...

 

[Craterus22]

The Oobs rules for DM

So are we using oobs rules? I didn't notice it quoted in the previous 17 pages?

More importantly, I didn't see it listed on first post.

 

[oyzar]

No. He just posted them to get a definition of double moves, since there isn't one from failedreality.

 

[Sonnybonds]

No. He just posted them to get a definition of double moves, since there isn't one from failedreality.

He is right you know.

 

[failedreality]

I'm glad we can all get along