I'm pretty sure I didn't make a request. I assumed they were meant for city graphics. In which case a walled version would be a reasonable expectation. And given the quality of the work shown would be even more incentive to download the set.No.
And this is not the place to ask for a new graphic either.
So in the game context what would you expect to be the stylistically compatible visual indication that a city has built defensive improvements?I do not create a wall around something else anymore, since the towns are all individual buildings
From the preview? No. You've got 4 towns with 4 different names.Isnt it obvious enough that the graphic changes from the pavilion to the red fort, thus the city has built fortifications?
Why on earth do you find it necessary to be so snarky? You have cities of one building. You create something vaguely similar in architectural style to the Agra Fort (originally built by the Rajput, taken over by the Sultan of Delhi, and only later rebuilt by the Mughals) for a city & then expect it to be recognized as a walled version of another city that looks nothing at all the same. I guess as the other cities transmogrify they "obviously" indicate a change in size. Perhaps, when you change the graphics so far from the standard, you could give a little explanation of your intentions if you would like people to download & install them.I see, so you want to be able to tell which city is walled without actually playing the game.
Moreover you don't see a well-known fort as an indication of fortifications.
Then i guess you should dl some other set for india
Quoted for truth:Well you dont realise it i guess, but your initial question set the tone for this little exchange (hint: when in a finished work thread, it is always nice to start not by a request/criticism, but with some praise about the work itself)
Yep. Definitely snarky.Do you do walled versions?