Ffh Nes Ii

Woah, now we have to actually pay attention to the "npc" nations! People!
Eekin, Corbus, so that leaves either the Kuriotates or the Syrii.
 
The League: Bannor, Amurites, Hippus
Axis of Evil: Sheaim, Sidar, 'Als, Eekin, Halluchuip
South Alliance: Elves, Kappa, Kuriotates

Neutral: Syrii, Corbus EDIT: And the Grigori

That's all you really need to know I think.
 
What he said, but we prefer, "The Coalition" (I do anyway). You should probably join. It makes sense by proximity, and there are plenty of benefits.

Oh, speaking of treaties
LDI, it should be mentioned that the Eekin and Sheaim have always had an agreement not to invade each others' islands. Not that you were thinking it...
 
The Corbus have been at odds with The Coalition of Evil (:p) for a while. I wouldn't join if I were you.
 
Wait just a second, first most hippus don't like camulos worshipers, but as one of the keys of the Foxmen is tolerance so we accept them. Second sure there's the fist issue but I see us as more neutral than anything.
You however have the Sheim, and the whole undead thing backs you more evil than us. Not by much probably but still you are more evil. :p
 
I'm only evil because the civ I'm based off is evil! I haven't betrayed anyone, or backed out of deals, or had any undead problems. Unlike your entire continent.
 
yeah, backstabbing your allies is more self-serving then evil. I mean, the Bannor vassalized the Grig instead of wiping them out, so really the League is merciful.

The Alsidara'lluchiriem or whatever you're calling yourselves now on the other hand, come on. Mass brandings? Genocide from like turn 6 (Hallowed)? Skellingtons? I guess the Luchirrip aren't really evil (yet), but they've got some mean friends.

The Three Nations Alliance, on the other hand, has never done anything but help puppies out of burning buildings and give teenagers stern looks. We would never think of awakening a mad Cthulhuic god to wreak psychotic vengeance on the world that has forgotten him, nope not us.
 
That means were untrustworthy, not evil. Those are two completely different things. And other than the Fist thing, which my men were just following the orders given, I have done my best to help all of those on our continent by removing those who would harm the peace with their violate ways, the Huppo, the old Gnolls, and the Clan. I do take great offense being called evil. I mean if I was evil the Grigori wouldn't be here after the Fist thing, I would of plowed through them like tissue paper and then I'd probably own the Ir-O-Kee lans. If I was evil there would be no need to debate it, I don't do half evil I go all the way.

Darn Double X-posted
 
I was ALMOST done researching 'Experimental Anti-Zombie Firetubes' (Shotguns.) :P.

Anyway, Grigori lost trust and friends, so the Grigori is sem-alone again. They just have cordial... relationships... (Indiscrete cough)
 
I think we should just stop with the "they're evil!" labels.
 
We have no plans on any aggression towards the Grigori, as of now our only interest is to rebuild after the zombie attack. Eko, can correct me if I'm wrong.

Edit: But these labels are so fun, it's how our nations view each other. I think it adds to the game.
 
I don't think the Kuriorates are the third NPC, that would be one sweet nation to pick up. It seems more likely to me that the White Mist Elves would be taken over by another player, but I have no idea what Immac worked out with Nutranase.

Well the labels seem more used to explain like "why the players are opposed to each other." I mean seriously, there can't be a single person who thinks the Eekin are evil, but they sure get called it a lot now. And I don't see how a continent who embraces peace and mutual cooperation is "evil". Seems to me that would fall under the heading of "good". :D

Which leads me to ask: this supposed to represent isn't in-game attitudes is it? I always assumed not, considering we've never actually talked to each other.
 
Back
Top Bottom