Chandrasekhar said:Have you deleted your custom assets folder?
Isamael said:Yes, I have.
What should be my next move? This issue is really frustrating for me, and my knowledge when it comes to this kind of stuff are far off boundries.
Anyway... to all you people that work with the FfHII, thank you for making this MOD reality.
Kael said:Thats a very odd problem, I haven't seen it before. Do you have a language other than english selected?
i just move hunters to Tracking in my games (so they're at the tech level that all the other tier 2 units are), because for the same reason archer of leaves aren't useful, normal archers aren't really either, because you already have hunters before them, and hunters can take up any position with more versatility and no counters to them.SchpailsMan said:Double move in forests make them good barb-busters that don't require resource. But then again, getting Leaves means you at least get hunters too, so the real issue is not that AoL are weaker than common archers but rather that they're not any stronger than common hunters.
Don't forget that rushing to a religion is a very common strategy. I often find myself only able to build warriors until I get my first religion (typically OO or Runes), so the religion-specific unit usually doesn't have to be much better than its non-religion counterparts to be useful. But Leaves somehow break this because hunters are so easy to get.
I had the same problem for Civ 3 when I installed the patch for Conquests. The only way I fixed it was by reinstalling everything.Though it feels like the problem has something to do about the actual written text in the game (impressed by my technical skills? Nah...). When I start up the 'CREDITS' page under 'OPTIONS' it only shows different CIV symbols. Both familiar and FfHII ones.
Nero's fire said:I had the same problem for Civ 3 when I installed the patch for Conquests. The only way I fixed it was by reinstalling everything.
no offense taken, though i assume incorrect contentless statements about incorrect assessments of redundance are humourous to you, because thats the only reason for you to make a statement about that at all.SchpailsMan said:I think you already said something along those lines once or twice
(no offence meant)
eerr said:are the lanun immortals supposed to be so weak?