Sid_Unbreakable
Dark Lord
I was just about to post that, but you beat me to it.
The Acheron the Red Dragon having defense bonuses is kind of cool, I wonder if that was done to make it unique to the other dragons.
FfH2 Bug Thread
- Thread starter KillerClowns
- Start date
I was just about to post that, but you beat me to it.
The Acheron the Red Dragon having defense bonuses is kind of cool, I wonder if that was done to make it unique to the other dragons.
I've been stealing away the Elves' tigers as soon as I can with my Satyr units, but after a stack of priests summon them, I get attacked by a stack of tigers in the same turn.
It seems that the AI is able to use tigers on the same turn that they are summoned. Perhaps this is a balance against the possibility that the player is using Satyrs, but it is obviously different from how the player gets to use tigers.
Additionally, the AI is completely unaware of the risk they run when summoning tigers after the player has demonstrated that they have a Satyr. While the AI does not depend on this alone as their defense, continuing to "reinforce" their stacks with summoned tigers just feeds the attacking army with more units when facing a Satyr.
It seems that the AI is able to use tigers on the same turn that they are summoned. Perhaps this is a balance against the possibility that the player is using Satyrs, but it is obviously different from how the player gets to use tigers.
Additionally, the AI is completely unaware of the risk they run when summoning tigers after the player has demonstrated that they have a Satyr. While the AI does not depend on this alone as their defense, continuing to "reinforce" their stacks with summoned tigers just feeds the attacking army with more units when facing a Satyr.
Nikis-Knight
Deity
An issue with enraged seems to be if a unit in a stack is enraged, it will drag that stack around, sometimes before you get a chance to split it up. Very annoying when an archmage mutates a stack with wonder and you don't notice.
DemonMaster
A.K.A. Fenhorn
And then lets talk at the AC 90 things, that was the most annoying thing I have ever experienced. It was not fun, it was exciting, it was not anything but annoying, especially on a map like Erebus, where the idiots just move around because you aren't at war with anyone or the one you are at war with live on the continent next door or beyond a civ that you don't have open border agreement with.
Hint: If this is how you in the team like it, then please at least let the enraged be totally enraged, let them attack and pass borders, as it is now its just annoying, or let them be barbarians.
I can avoid units that normally get enraged, regardless if playing good or evil, but if I play evil I would like to do it all the way, not just to AC89 but no more because after that the game just become ... or perhaps lets put this as an option or something.
Other than that (yeah, and the blob issue) the game is fun, Acheron and everything (yeah, why can't he fly?).
beorn
Prince
Text says that great merchant will be used towards mathematics, but it is actually used towards currency
Whenever I've had a problem like that I assumed that something went wrong with the download and redid the download for the FFH main patch, the sub-patch, and the media files as well. You could try that but I am by no means an expert...
Didn't work :-(. This mod looks really cool though.
Another weird thing is that in the civilopedia, the modals for the different units don't show up.
Kael
Deity
The only difference between playing FfH and playing a scenario is that a movie doesn't play before a scenario. So if you load scenarios fine but not the normal game then you comptuer is having a problem displaying movies. I would recheck to make sure they are disabled correctly.
Methuselah
King
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Messages
- 677
Didn't work :-(. This mod looks really cool though.
Another weird thing is that in the civilopedia, the modals for the different units don't show up.
From the first post:
4. If FfH crashes when starting a game and when you look in the Civilopedia from the main menu and you can't see units, then you have only applied the patch and you need to download and install the main mod (then reapply the patch).
__Matt
Chieftain
Playing Hippus patch K
Magnadine has the ability to recruit mercinaries. The colour text suggests they are used to garrison newly captured cities. They actually appear in your capital, in my case many, many moves behind the front line... Either colour text or spawn location is incorrect.
Cheers
Magnadine has the ability to recruit mercinaries. The colour text suggests they are used to garrison newly captured cities. They actually appear in your capital, in my case many, many moves behind the front line... Either colour text or spawn location is incorrect.
Cheers
DemonMaster
A.K.A. Fenhorn
A number of things I noticed that is weird.
1) The Apocalyse happen at AC98 (226/230) not at AC100.
2) The Grigori built the Mercurian ... bah, he built Basium.
3) There are 8 members of the undercouncil and 9 civs. I forgot to check the voting (and that sign still says UN btw) but a guess would be that the Grigori is a member and Basium is not, but they are a team and since Basium usually joins the other council isn't this a little strange.
Regarding 1) above. It would be cool if all the "AC events" happened at a random AC number +-2 or something.
But in my case. A guess here is that on an AI turn the AC hit 100, but before it was my turn, another AI did something that lowered it to AC98 (it was AC97 when I ended my turn before it happend). Could it be this that has happened?
Regarding 2) and 3) above. Wouldn't it be logical that either only a good civ is able to build that gate/basium or at least change that civs alignment so it becomes good. I have had a number of cases lately with just ridiculous combinations just because that a neutral civ can build this.
Another thing that should be done is that Basium should be able to end the "team relationship" if his "team mate" does something badly like join AV, or the undercouncil or becomes evil.
1) The Apocalyse happen at AC98 (226/230) not at AC100.
2) The Grigori built the Mercurian ... bah, he built Basium.
3) There are 8 members of the undercouncil and 9 civs. I forgot to check the voting (and that sign still says UN btw) but a guess would be that the Grigori is a member and Basium is not, but they are a team and since Basium usually joins the other council isn't this a little strange.
Regarding 1) above. It would be cool if all the "AC events" happened at a random AC number +-2 or something.
But in my case. A guess here is that on an AI turn the AC hit 100, but before it was my turn, another AI did something that lowered it to AC98 (it was AC97 when I ended my turn before it happend). Could it be this that has happened?
Regarding 2) and 3) above. Wouldn't it be logical that either only a good civ is able to build that gate/basium or at least change that civs alignment so it becomes good. I have had a number of cases lately with just ridiculous combinations just because that a neutral civ can build this.
Another thing that should be done is that Basium should be able to end the "team relationship" if his "team mate" does something badly like join AV, or the undercouncil or becomes evil.
westamastaflash
Lord Commander
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 933
Warrens don't respect Rally Points. I'd like to be able to send both units to the city I've selected, not just the first.
reverend oats
King
DemonMaster
A.K.A. Fenhorn
... and just for the record, wouldn't it be logical if there was an all out war when the Apocalypse event happens, it is the end of the world as we know it after all.
And to avoid any strange behaviour with the neutral summoning good Basium, force the summoner to become good and force the team to break if he joins AV or the undercouncil, a popup warning perhaps that say if you do this then Basium will leave you. Perhaps joining another good civ, or be on his own.
I rather have a game that is at least in a way logical, than a game that allows everything just because ... I can't come up with a good explanation. I had the Grigori, what next the Illians summoning Basium. Okey the main game is the main game and its not glued to any story and should be somewhat random based, but isn't there a limit to this everything goes principle? is nothing holy so to speak?
And to avoid any strange behaviour with the neutral summoning good Basium, force the summoner to become good and force the team to break if he joins AV or the undercouncil, a popup warning perhaps that say if you do this then Basium will leave you. Perhaps joining another good civ, or be on his own.
I rather have a game that is at least in a way logical, than a game that allows everything just because ... I can't come up with a good explanation. I had the Grigori, what next the Illians summoning Basium. Okey the main game is the main game and its not glued to any story and should be somewhat random based, but isn't there a limit to this everything goes principle? is nothing holy so to speak?
Asthix
Prognosticator
Had the red/purple blob issue 4 times in a hotseat game before turn 200. Runniong Xp, patch j. Reloading fixed them, then it'd happen to another unit x turns later.
westamastaflash
Lord Commander
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 933
I think this is a bug/feature related to religious units as well. If your permanent ally is of a different religion or alignment than you, you can build the units of that religion/alignment.
Similar threads
