akots said:IMO, we should try to play by the rules. And no sneaky attack or exploitive tactics please. They were punished enough. Trying to use their situation by exploiting it would be not a good idea.
Rik Meleet said:Emp: you sneaky bastard !!
Where did you get this plan ?
I slightly disagree. Of course we should use the money we get from C3B for military purposes. We should use this UN ruling to the max (that is: to the max of playing fair ). We should continue building our mainland with a little more emphasis on building our military to prepare for a war with C3B, since this war will be unavoidable. We already agreed on that before this whole Joker-case. Continueing in the spirit of the game (as Matrix quoted nicely) would mean in this case to prepare for the war we were preparing already for. As long as we play it fair!Yndy said:I think we should use the cash we're going to receive to increase our reasearch rate and develop our cities. Attacking C3B would still mean we'll have to fight against Immortals when we are not prepared to fight immortals. Yes, maybe we should jumpstart our golden age but not commit all forces to an all out attack.
I'm 100% behind you akots but unfortunately I'm short of time. The recent comeback is due to the fact that I'm too stressed out to work and need something to distract me. It'll be over soon so it'll still be on your shouldersakots said:@Yndy. It would be really nice if you are more active here! The "common sense" tactics seems to have been running on low support recently.
So the dark path is the path everyone walks who don't agree with you?Provolution said:Gert-Jani , you just faced Embryonism, and I am glad you did not pick the easy dark path
I'd rather have 8 ACs go obsolete if so do 20 Immortals.Provolution said:I am 100 % convinced there will be a war, and you can just let our units like Ancient Cavalry and so on become obsolete.