IronfighterXXX
Work Hard - Play Hard
I don't see the point of this thread. Did you really think Firaxis would say, "well we were going to release it unplayable, but since you asked..."
Yes, this is exactly what I thought.

Seriously though, the point of this thread is to show that there are players for which is more important that game will be somewhat balanced, bug free than if Gandhi will be leader of India or graphic (but currently I'm not fan too

We have some valid basis for concern based on track record, and yes I think in a strategy title the game's playability should be prioritized over its appearance.
This conceptually needs to be separated out. "Balance between civs" and "balance of things you can do in the game" are two separate concepts. The latter is more important.
Taken to extremes, the latter can make it so one-sided that doing anything other than 4 city tradition is a false choice, or anything other than ICS false choice, or anything other than culture false choice etc to the extent that the game because centralized around a tiny fraction of its possible options, which then overwhelm other considerations.
That kind of stuff hurts the game a lot more than stuff like "Poland's unique stuff is better than France's".
Those are important thoughts with which I agree.

I don't want to justify the modern plague completely unfinished games being released too early (like civ5)"
We, as players community have made this by buying partially finished games or even worse pre-ordering them.