1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Fort spamming

Discussion in 'Rise from Erebus Modmod' started by Andvare, Sep 5, 2010.

  1. Tsathoggua

    Tsathoggua Warlord

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    127
    If I recall it's the commander that does the culture spreading, so maybe not.
     
  2. Valkrionn

    Valkrionn The Hamster King

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    14,450
    Location:
    Crestview FL
    It is not, no. The commander originally spread the culture, but that is now handled innately by the improvements. You can have the culture provided by a fort without a fort commander, it'll just be vulnerable to theft by other players.
     
  3. Luckmann

    Luckmann Esusian Epicure

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    527
    Location:
    The Towers of Amur.
    Because it leaves an exposed fort, obviously.
     
  4. Calavente

    Calavente Richard's voice

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,861
    Location:
    France
    it is not really limited : playing quick/small and aggressive in mid-late game, I have 6-7 GC... and at least 4 of them are lvl 4, some are lvl 3 and some are lvl 5-6/ meaning with the new system I could have built : 20-25 forts or command posts. As I have 2 command post that makes more than 20 forts !!! even now I haven't built that number... only 7 forts !!!
     
  5. Andvare

    Andvare King

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    788
    Only 20? Hah! ;)

    This game is my Khazad. I completely blocked in three civs, and partially blocked two other civs.
    The barbs was never a threat, as my forts were strong enough to handle everything thrown at them.
    Can't remember how many forts I build, but it was more than 20.
    The replay shows the extent of this sillyness (only on monarch, I like to play on a low diff when trying out new things).

    I also had a game as the Mechanos, where I was DOW'ed by the evil lizards. They were no threat, as I has so many forts between them and I, but I hadn't built any siege units yet, nor had much in terms of combat than warriors. I won that war because I could build a fort right next to their capital (plus they had also build one right next to it). The combined range combat of two forts took care of that city.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Calavente

    Calavente Richard's voice

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,861
    Location:
    France
    Andvare :

    well, if you built more than 20 forts, it's clearly is fort-spamming. that has to go IMO.(I remind you that on a small map... 40 forts covers the whole world.
    So 20 cover about 1/2 world. If you built more, just to "isolate yourself" you weren't playing a small map. and obviously, on a larger map, you'll have more ennemies, so more GC.

    Saying that limiting 1fort per level of GC is "limitating"... it's wrong. I've shown that in a small map, with few fights, one can easily build, with GC, 20+forts.
    You can build the other one you want with workers if you want.


    I wasn't saying that 20 forts is OP, just that even with the actual way of building forts, I'm building less what would be allowed to me under the next mechanism
     
  7. dunedainjedi

    dunedainjedi Warlord

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    117
    See at this point the GCs popping forts becomes an exploit to me. If the AI is dumb enough to build a fort next door to their capital by all means use it. But rolling your SoD in, popping a fort for the collateral damage+cultural healing just feels like cheating to me.

    Support costs + 1 GC pop/lvl is the best way to handle it. I'd prefer to see GCs not be able to cast field fortification in enemy territory.
     
  8. Elwist

    Elwist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    As I was reading this the idea, which may be bad, occurred to me that if you were not to give the forts a commander until they grew the first time this might help. You could still build the forts, but you would have to protect them for some time before they could defend themselves so you would either have to have more troops, take longer between each fort, or leave them unguarded to be potentially claimed by other people.
     
  9. RFHolloway

    RFHolloway Analyst in the UK

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    860
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    or even convert an exisiting unit to a fort commander rather than provide essentially a free unit.
     

Share This Page