With all the new restrictions on freedom of speech put in place by 1st World countries I fear if we, as multiple societies, aren't loosing the freedom to debate as well.
I am reminded of Charlie, sure his ideas on a number of subjects were horrifying, at least for me, but I am also sure he never got on the stage and directly pointed fingers saying "you that is X or Y and does W or Z should just drop dead for the benefit of society".
In this sense I believe he never went, truly, too far with is freedom of speech and so another form to curtail his ideas from spreading was found...killing him shows that beyond freedom of speech being at risk we a have a risk of loosing our freedom to debate ideas without dogmas or taboos.
And I wonder if forbidding debate is the right thing to do by democracy.
Is shutting other's opinion on a matter really the right thing to do to protect others sensibilities?
Won't this give rise to more extreme views from folks who find their voice silenced?