Funny Screenshots

[aaronflavor]

Please everybody, make inline images and stop attaching them, it takes longer to load and you have to do a lot of extra clicks.

Apparently something in the forum configuration just changed.

 

[Meffy]

Apparently something in the forum configuration just changed.

Yes, some of the images in the previous page were inline when I read it yesterday. Now all of them are attachments.

 

[Mirc]

Does it have any connection with this thread?
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=157580

Also, just a test:

 

[LLXerxes]

This happened before I was researching Biology, if you'll notice. The two pics I posted are the same game, but I'm researching Biology in the second, later pic. So I didn't have biology. And what is the Artesian Well? Is that a joke, or did I miss something?

Anyways, I built a Destroyer, can't you tell? Oh, wait... I must be using the "Floating city" mod!

Also you'll find a circular rail road track, with all the tracks going out in the same direction. So you can get on, but you'll never get off!

 

[aslindy]

Siamese tanks???

 

[CivFan91]

I did that too, with about a dozen Bombers. Take that, Teotihuacan!

Speaking of that city, taking it caused a *small* cultural issue:

 

[A Silly Goose]

Siamese tanks???

I think it's just another one of the Nazis' crazy prototypes.

 

[Charles 22]

This new attachment thing has got to go!!!

So far today I've looked at between 3-4 of these attachments and on at least two occasions it took over the windows session. That doesn't bother me so much. but when I mean 'take over' I mean 'take over'. It doesn't allow me to go back to the thread I was on, and I'm forced to look at the image for eternity or drop the entire IE session. Subsequently I have to start up civfanatics on another browser session again, and with the load time on some of those website ads, that's real fun.

 

[ruff_hi]

I have found a face in the game I am playing at the moment ...

 

[CivFan91]

Well, if they made the thumbnails a bit larger (Say, 150 X 150) then we'd be OK. But this is ridiculous.

EDIT:

 

[Ultima Dragoon]

I have found a face in the game I am playing at the moment ...

That's cool.

 

[impervius]

picture 1: soul leaving man's body by rear entrance
picture 2: check that groovy lake man!
picture 3: sorry, another aqueduct one, but i havent seen this type of duct before

 

[member66170]

firaxis/take two really need to sort their aquaduct algorythms out.

 

[Shablul]

firaxis/take two really need to sort their aquaduct algorythms out.

Why? The funky aquaducts are cool!

Peace

 

[denogginizer]

I wasn't going to search through 40 some-odd pages to see if this had been posted before, but I don't think it would take as much time as chopping down a forest. No anarchy, either. And it really looks like a phone number in the Dallas area.

 

[warpus]

This new attachment thing has got to go!!!

So far today I've looked at between 3-4 of these attachments and on at least two occasions it took over the windows session. That doesn't bother me so much. but when I mean 'take over' I mean 'take over'. It doesn't allow me to go back to the thread I was on, and I'm forced to look at the image for eternity or drop the entire IE session. Subsequently I have to start up civfanatics on another browser session again, and with the load time on some of those website ads, that's real fun.

When you click on one of these attachments, they will open in another window. If they dont, then something is wrong with your browser; try a different one.

 

[meisen]

This new attachment thing has got to go!!!

So far today I've looked at between 3-4 of these attachments and on at least two occasions it took over the windows session. That doesn't bother me so much. but when I mean 'take over' I mean 'take over'. It doesn't allow me to go back to the thread I was on, and I'm forced to look at the image for eternity or drop the entire IE session. Subsequently I have to start up civfanatics on another browser session again, and with the load time on some of those website ads, that's real fun.

You could try Mozilla Firefox? I'm using it and have not had any problems from this site. That microsoft internet explorer is nuttin but trouble. A disaster running on borrowed time.

 

[Artanis]

You could try Mozilla Firefox? I'm using it and have not had any problems from this site. That microsoft internet explorer is nuttin but trouble. A disaster running on borrowed time.

This man speaks the truth!

The instant I first tried Opera*, I never looked back. Now, every time somebody tells me about browser troubles, my first question is, "are you using IE?". Thus far, the answer has been 'yes' Every. Single. Time.




*Disclaimer: Firefox is good too, possibly even a little better than Opera...Opera is just what I'm used to (I needs my mouse-click auto-back-button, I does! )

 

[Thunderfall]

Well, if they made the thumbnails a bit larger (Say, 150 X 150) then we'd be OK. But this is ridiculous.

I encourage people to use free image hosting service like ImageShack or PhotoBucket to host images.

http://www.imageshack.us/

It's simple to use and they provide you with the codes to include in forum post.

 

[ShaLouZa]

Thumbnails save bandwith, and bandwith is money. Support the site, use thumbnails and stop complaining about attachments.

And yes, use Firefox. Or Opera. Or whatever. If you use IE, don't complain about troubles : you should be used to it by now.

edit : mispelling corrected.