OK, at 500AD I already had the game under control, and victory by domination was not a question of "if" but of "when". At 500AD I was guessing if I really push I could finish in 1500's maybe. Basically, 500AD to finish went like this:
Build stack, conquer France, heal, build stack, upgrade, conquer Germany, heal and build stacks, conquer barbs, upgrade, heal, reinforce, conquer Russia. Mao never dared attack me despite being annoyed or worse the whole game. I spared him because he had Grens when I was still using rifles, and didn't want to lose lots of units that could be needed against Russia or India. Also to note, I never went past rifles+cavalry. By the end of the game, China and India are my technological equals - constant warring does that to tech rates.
On the Russia continent, I actually settled one city right after Astronomy, which was then used to launch attack on 3 barb cities just after Bismark is dead. Ugg... lots of troop moving and healing... a logisticcal pain in the ass.
Catherine is so backwards that she fall very quickly after my attack starts. Just the time it takes to move stack around that whole continent (the whole world, actually). Never a decent contest. Frigates helped against high culture defenses. But then I'm at only 61% land area. OK, I need to heal and tech ahead some so I can take an Indian or Chinese city, I guess. God this is taking long. Anyhow, before I can attack anyone, my cities come out of revolt pushing me over the 64%.
Domination win. NOt satisfying. Quite tedious, actually. Knowing the outcome is inevitable for a millenium before I can pull it off takes something away. Next time we play a prince or lower level game, I have to try for victory conditions that I usually don't go for. At least that way I'll keep it interesting. Its not like I'm a master at warring or anything. I didn't win until the early 1800's.
Victory date 1811.