Why can you only get a great leader from winning a battle with an elite unit? The greatest leaders in history were pacifists, not militaristic. eg: Muhammed, Jesus, Ghandi etc.
My Proposal:
Leaders should be divided into 2 types, militaristic and cultural.
Militaristic: can only create armies etc
Cultural: can hurry improvements.
You should be able to gain great cultural leaders when you hit certain crossroads in your civilization. This can be triggered by government changes to a more enlightrened form of gov't, the construction of a cetain number of cultural improvements etc.
This would allow peaceful players the ability to use leaders also.
Just a thought
My Proposal:
Leaders should be divided into 2 types, militaristic and cultural.
Militaristic: can only create armies etc
Cultural: can hurry improvements.
You should be able to gain great cultural leaders when you hit certain crossroads in your civilization. This can be triggered by government changes to a more enlightrened form of gov't, the construction of a cetain number of cultural improvements etc.
This would allow peaceful players the ability to use leaders also.
Just a thought