Hernan Cortez?

he kill many Aztec and destory there citys. He made slave of the Aztec and other.
 
He was a shrewd opportunist and had enormous cojones. For somewhat more usefull information, check out Conquest: Montezuma, Cortes, and the Fall of Old Mexico by Hugh Thomas.
 
It always helps to conquer a people when they think you are a "God," horrible coincidence that that is the way the Aztec religion worked.

-Pat
 
Horrible coincidence? I think it worked out for the best that these mass-human-sacrificing peoples were conquered and relieved of their animalistic culture. Sure, it's a loss of a historic civilization and of diversity in the world, but how do you think the sacrificed felt?

P.S. Were not the Aztecs cannibals also? I thought they ate the flesh of warriors believing that they would then acquire their skills.

If not, I'd like to know who I'm describing.
 
Here's my knowledge. I don't know if it's completely true but if it's worth anything here it is.


Cortez was the leader of a small expeditionary force of Spanish soldiers (Conquistadors). They landed in the Americas where they found the Aztecs and the glorious Golden Capitol of Tenochitlan. According to Aztec legend, when an army of evil gods (I don't know much about this) was defeated, they went away for many, many centuries and would return as white men with beards in canoes. The Conquistadors were thought to be the gods, and King Montezuma tried to appease them in hopes of saving the city of Tenochitlan from the evil gods' vengeful wrath. Eventually, Spain destroyed the Aztec Empire and looted Tenochitlan. Montezuma's younger brother assasinated his sibling and stole the throne; only to be hanged and defeated by the Spanish Conquistodors led by Cortez.
 
An interesting factlet is that he once hung one of his own soldiers who had stolen from one of the natives. So harsh, but fair.
 
The fact that the Aztec civilization was far from peaceful doesn't justify their extermination either. Let's take into consideration, of course, that not all Aztecs were equally "cannibalistic" and they were individual humans in their own right, not a faceless "mass".

Besides, if we go back into the "darker" eras of Europe (and I'm not referring to the Middle Ages, in case anyone gets that idea...this would be many thousands of years previously), we may even find only marginally "cleaner" behavior ( at the very least, I'm being generous), which I'm sure many would also find "repulsive".

Another example, this is like saying that, say, when some "superior" Alien species comes to Earth and, appalled by our bloody history and our raping of the planet, decides that we should all be purged, ignoring that not all humans are equally guilty for these actions.

In short, we shouldn't be judging others by our own modern moral codes, and we shouldn't generalize so much, negating the existence of individual responsibility, especially when those "others" happen to be from entirely different cultures and periods of historical development.

Good Day
 
In short, we shouldn't be judging others by our own modern moral codes
Agree. Now I hope you dont judge Cortez either.
 
Originally posted by Thorgalaeg

Agree. Now I hope you dont judge Cortez either.

Exactly. I "understand" that what he did has to be seen within the context of his time and circumstances, so I don't go along calling him a "bloody murdering Conquistador who deserves X or Y fate", but even so, I don't have to like it, of course. That's all I meant.

Good Day
 
Cortez (1485-1547) started from Havana in 1515 and landed at and established a base at Vera Cruz (the True Cross) in 1519 that became the traditional harbor of Mexico (including for later invasions). Within two years 1519-1521 he brought the Aztec Empire to his knees.
He travelled down to Guatemala as well.
He was harsh with his own soldiers too but not for any morale reason. He needed them to be prefectly obedient since they were so few of them in front of the numerous Aztecs. And besides, he needed the help of part of the Aztec community so there were political moves as well.

You must not speak of genocide neither for Cortez nor Pizarro. Ruthless and greedy for sure but they did not intend to mass murder the entire population at all since they would need this population to exploit the wealth of the countries. Now, an extreme violence and perhaps the allowing of disease spreading were advantages to break resistance but on the long term the poulation was the source of wealth of the countries.

Recruiting mercenaries was easy for Spain ahd been at war against the Muslim until 1492 so there were troops for hire. Besides one of the social aspect of the Reconquista was to give nobility over recently freed area to soldiers so that they should protect the newly recovered lands. This lead to an influx of nobility in Spain when economic conditions did not allow it. The cadets, impoverished noblemen educated for war (the hidalgos) were one key element in the conquest of the Americas.
 
Originally posted by puglover
Here's my knowledge. I don't know if it's completely true but if it's worth anything here it is.


Cortez was the leader of a small expeditionary force of Spanish soldiers (Conquistadors). They landed in the Americas where they found the Aztecs and the glorious Golden Capitol of Tenochitlan. According to Aztec legend, when an army of evil gods (I don't know much about this) was defeated, they went away for many, many centuries and would return as white men with beards in canoes. The Conquistadors were thought to be the gods, and King Montezuma tried to appease them in hopes of saving the city of Tenochitlan from the evil gods' vengeful wrath. Eventually, Spain destroyed the Aztec Empire and looted Tenochitlan. Montezuma's younger brother assasinated his sibling and stole the throne; only to be hanged and defeated by the Spanish Conquistodors led by Cortez.

553 soilders in fact
 
currently doing a big project on Spanish colonialism in South-America. If you know Dutch I can send you my file on Cortez, if not, you'll have to wait some weeks. :p
 
Many modern Latin American historians now are unconvinced that the Aztecs actually beleived that Cortez was a god from the onset.
 
Back
Top Bottom