Horsemen/Monarchy Conquest Strategy

[Divaythsarmour]

See, but he probably can distinguish an opinion from an argument. What you originally said though didn't have an indication of it as an opinion. It only had indications of it as an argument. I simply don't understand why you didn't say "sorry, I meant..." But instead you've made it seem as if he misunderstood what you wrote. Thing comes as, he didn't. He misunderstood what you meant, sure. But what you wrote, was NOT consistent with what you meant, so you can't reasonbly hold him accountable for that.

It was Chaosarbiter who made the distinction between an argument and an opinion. That was his justification for putting words in my mouth after I had already explained what I meant. By then, I wasn't really in the mood for saying "sorry."

I would have agreed with his point if I had written that the Mongols were the BEST for this strategy. But I didn't. I wrote "Iroqois are good for this strategy, but the Mongols are even better."

 

[Raliuven]

I suppose that analysis of a strategy in a game with finite variables is less alluring than the infinite possibilities of human interaction. As I wrote before "I'm up for it."

BTW - I liked you analysis of Iroq MW vs. Mongol horsemen both upgrading to knights earlier in the thread.

Thanks. I don't do a lot of early rushing - so for what it's worth. I'm a builder, not a fighter by nature. Such games can be very gratifying, though.

I think you may be here for a while.