Nuclear kid said:
How come when the Arabs, Chineese, Aztecs, Africans, and Indians were way stronger and more advanced, all ended up being colonised by backwards, and weak Europe?
Because Europe wasn't backwards or weak, and these other lands weren't really way stronger and more advanced...
Europe may have been considered backward in the 5-12th centuries by historians, but as a group they weren't actually BEHIND in technologies that were spread during this time period (water wheel, eyeglasses, textiles, horse collar, stirrups, capitalism, better sea navigation techniques... where is the backwardness here?). They were able to pursue local affairs without a massive tax on everything to support the Roman Empire (which had been decaying for awhile before it collapsed) so it might actually have been an improvement over the Roman Empire from some people's points of view.
Europe wasn't in any position to do any global colonizing after the Romans fell but neither was anybody else. The colonization you are probably speaking of didn't happen until the 15th century and later, well after significant portions of Europe had turned capitalist and started multiplying overall productivity through investment (that really developed somewhere in the 10th-11th centuries). That's not a weakness nor is it backward, especially if nobody else in the world was pursuing economic productivity and growth at anywhere near the same scale.
Although, now that I am thinking about it, it depends on what you think of as backwards and weak, but this is finally my answer to the original topic of the thread. (It took awhile to think up what I really think was the difference.)
Just think of it... the fall of the
Western Roman Empire happened almost a THOUSAND YEARS before the colonial powers started spreading out, and FOUR HUNDRED YEARS after "capitalism and investment banking" was finally able to permanently establish itself in Europe as a method of multiplying productivity. Granted, industrial cities were more like enclaves rather than ubiquitious, but consider that attempts to establish places like this elsewhere failed to maintain permanence.