Zardnaar
Deity
This guy seems to think 500+ nukes are enough to waste all of N.A.T.O.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/478902...hief-threatens-west-with-nuclear-destruction/
He's probably right.
This guy seems to think 500+ nukes are enough to waste all of N.A.T.O.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/478902...hief-threatens-west-with-nuclear-destruction/
Nixonian madman theory
oh , now that comes up , 200 . None of the rest will go boom . True stuff , America knows .
One wonders how the same people who just refused to place soldiers as security against attack, now claim they are cool with nuclear war.
You think none of their nuclear arsenal has decayed, and they've upkept all their remaining stockpile?Russia have enouth Nukes to end human's life
I saw some videos, look like the arsenal is good enought to exterminate human life.You think none of their nuclear arsenal has decayed, and they've upkept all their remaining stockpile?
Ok, we know they have about 6 thousand nukes. However, nuclear weapons destroy themselves in storage. They require a lot of expertise, labor, and material to maintain. Russia hasn't been training very many replacement scientists at all. So the question is, how many of those bombs will work?I saw some videos, look like the arsenal is good enought to exterminate human life.
But about the main question, I guess Russia have around 6 thousand nukes
How many do you need to create horrifying destruction?You think none of their nuclear arsenal has decayed, and they've upkept all their remaining stockpile?
It crossed my mind as well, but maintaining one lab's worth of handful of fission bombs is going to be orders less complicated than the numerous sites of giant missiles holding bigger more complex fusion bombs.https://thebulletin.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/nuclearnotebook-March2022-russia-table1.pdf
FAS says 1,588 under active deployment.
How many of them are functional? I would assume most. Rot-gut North Korea has bombs and much of their economy is based on meth cooking and printing fake foreign currency.
That was my question to everyone in the OP.How many do you need to create horrifying destruction?
Nobody here can give credible answer. We will never know.. hopefully.So the question is, how many of those bombs will work?
Ok, we know they have about 6 thousand nukes. However, nuclear weapons destroy themselves in storage. They require a lot of expertise, labor, and material to maintain. Russia hasn't been training very many replacement scientists at all. So the question is, how many of those bombs will work?
They could have all 6000. Or they could have 0, or anything in between.