venerable would be a good one.
Velvet-Glove said:Another Ancient one here, LOL! I celebrated my half century on this earth in March.My eldest son will be 22 years old next month - he introduced me to Civ a few years ago and I think I have probably notched up more hours and game experience than he ever has (he's a stick-in-the-mud Civ II man, but I think the truth is he's scared of taking up the gauntlet against his mum with a newer version, lol!).
PS. No offence taken here at the 'ancient' category, BTW. I don't mind being one of the forum elders at all, it's quite amusing & refreshing to see the diverse age range here.![]()
henrycccc said:I'm 13, and I feel sorry for anyone over 20 that plays civ. Really, GET A LIFE PEOPLE. If you stopped playing civ maybe you could get a date.
Gargoyle said:It would be funny to have you, me and other grey panthers, play multiplayer vs that 13 year old who posted the "get a date" remark. And have him finish dead last.![]()
Hunh. Kids these days. No sense of responsibility. I didn't lollygag around and wait until I was 18 to start voting! No, sir! I voted at 17.StarWorms said:18 in 8 days, I'll wait until then to vote![]()
henrycccc said:I'm 13, and I feel sorry for anyone over 20 that plays civ. Really, GET A LIFE PEOPLE. If you stopped playing civ maybe you could get a date.
henrycccc said:I'm 13, and I feel sorry for anyone over 20 that plays civ. Really, GET A LIFE PEOPLE. If you stopped playing civ maybe you could get a date.