• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days (this includes any time you see the message "account suspended"). For more updates please see here.

ID Cards: UK Parliament approves second reading

What narks you about the UK ID card scheme?

  • It's too expensive

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • It's another Government IT project that will fail

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Its database will be cracked

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • It requires too much personal detail

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It won't help against crime

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It won't help against terrorism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It won't help against fraud

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It will create an underclass of non-ID'd citizens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It isn't compulsory/will become compulsory

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It uses biometrics engendering a false sense of reliability

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's a primary tool of totalitarian states, not democracies

    Votes: 9 39.1%
  • It will be abused by racist institutions

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It will be invalidated by forgeries

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It will compel greater surveillance of a free society

    Votes: 3 13.0%
  • It allows for false registration through birth certificates

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It uses Biometrics

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • I think there is nothing wrong with the proposed UK ID cards and I'm also barking mad

    Votes: 4 17.4%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
People should've seen this coming years ago when they were tacitly accepting the propagation of traffic monitor and public area cameras :mad: . I'd definitely refuse as far as I could reasonably afford to, but I'm not in the UK.
 
I would oppose ID cards, and would gladly get myself arrested for not carrying one.
 
Holy crap - they actually include biometrics (as in fingerprints, or something more innocuous?)!? Good lord that's outrageous; there's no way in bleep I would ever voluntarily give the govt any additional biometric info (they're so responsible with the info they already have anyway). I'm already contemplating abandoning air travel to avoid the same; the idea of the govt forcing it upon you is ridiculous (I should shut my mouth before the U.S. proposal comes out next month). Best of luck to all you UK citizens. Fight the good fight!

Edit: on-topic, I'd vote for all poll choices but the last, and it even makes me barking mad to boot...
 
Fingerprints, iris scans (and photograph).


There is no way of limiting the legislation to prevent this being extended.


Bush has already rejected it for US citizens, so you're safe for now.
 
classical_hero said:
What do the ID cards do?
The argument about whether or not to have them has gone on for so long, that everyone (on both sides) has forgotten what they were designed to do :crazyeye:
 
IC cards per se aren't bad but actually quite useful as a means of identifying yourself (at banks, etc.).

What I don't like is if anything but the most basic data is recorded on them. Religion for example has no point there. And certainly no biometric data...
 
But we already have 101 different ID cards - what do we need another one for?
 
stormbind said:
But we already have 101 different ID cards - what do we need another one for?
No man. You are missing the point. We are going to have those 101 put into just 1 card. It's a lot easier to conduct identity fraud with just one central database to steal from.
 
Will it be one central database though? The ability to read/write to portions of memory can be subcontracted to maintainers of specialist databases. I do not know if that is how it's supposed to work - I am just speculating and pumping out some mind borts.
 
Yes and I am just guffing out some half baked Rambu cakes.

EDIT - A clear sign I should go skin up!
 
JoeM said:
Fingerprints, iris scans (and photograph).


There is no way of limiting the legislation to prevent this being extended.


Bush has already rejected it for US citizens, so you're safe for now.

I'm reminded of building and development consents - these, starting out as a 'minor alteration', very easily become a complete rebuild in fact, if not on paper - I recall a local historical building approved for minor alteration. Only later did locals learn the place was, literally, to be bulldozed - leaving perhaps a tenth of the original - to make way for a modern contruction in the middle of one of the area's oldest/most historical districts...

This must be an area in which some liberals and conservatives can agree 100% - 'don't poop in my backyard, and don't poop within 1 foot of it!'
 
@stormbind
One of the issues is that the discussions on implimentation are a closed process - we don't know how they want to implement it, or worse they don't know either.

@10seven
You are absolutely right, liberals and conservatives all voted against it, plus several government rebels.
 
Back
Top Bottom