TV 7 NEWS
Chancellor Yingjang Shinawatra debunks "UAR-AF Propaganda"
- Simon Fox, Presenter of TV 7 News
- Chancellor Yingjang Shinawatra
Simon: Welcome to TV7 News. This time, we have once again the esteemed Chancellor of Thailand, Yingjang Shinawatra, once again in our TV station. We shall talk about the war and the "UAR-AF propaganda", as the Chancellor has called the remarks made by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the African Federation, Mr. Robert Hood. But first, let's welcome the Chancellor.
Yingjang: Welcome Simon. It is my honor to be able to talk here.
S: Thank you. You flatter us. Now, my first question is: what do you have to say to your critics who parallel your police action in Indonesia with Japan's imperialism?
Y: Clearly, such people have little to no knowledge of the situation in Indonesia and Thailand and try to awe and make a fuss with their ignorance and only superficial knowledge of the situation. I really hope that Mr. Robert Hood belongs to this category of people, for being ignorant does not mean being a bad person. But if he has knowledge of the situation and says those remarks, then this is even worse because it shows that he is a bad politician, a war hawk who uses propaganda to promote Imperialism.
It does not take too much knowledge of the situation for one to be able to realize that Thai intervention in Indonesia is more akin to the Iraq War, to use an example, than Japanese expansion in Vietnam.
Military reports clearly show that civilian areas have been avoided. Ground troops are limited to 20,000 Marines, whose only mission will be to takeover strategic areas. The bombardment has been limited, and this can be verified by
any independent NGO, to Military Bases, Army Units and Power Stations
that power the Indonesian Military Bases.
I do not understand which civilian areas have been bombarded. Really, we have stated again and again, and the war reports can verify this, that we avoid civilian areas in our bombardment campaigns. Yet, out of nowhere, we are linked to Japanese Imperialism. Clearly, our critics are war hawks and/or racists who link every Asian military action, even minor, to "Japanese" Imperialism.
Also, I would like to know how Mr. Robert believes that Russia has the right to intervene with all out war at "destabilizing" neighboring nations and
annex them, while Thailand, which has repeatedly supported Indonesian sovereignty and has stated again and again that after the war, an election supervised by the UN shall take place, are bad imperialists?
It does not make sense, at least in my mind. I hope that Mr. Robert shall reply to my question, but this esteemed politician will most probably ignore such questions which jeopardize his "All Asians are bad" ideology.
S: In the same TV program, you have been linked to Mr. Takeshi Ruchang, Shogun of Japan. What do you have to reply?
Y: Of course, as every Asian nation that takes military action is immediately called the "New Japan", it's political leader is immediately called the "New Ruchang". I would like to ask my critics in what sense have I resembled Mr. Takeshi? I am not a leader elected by the mob, but a Chancellor appointed by His Imperial Highness, the Emperor Rama XXVII, and reappointed by his successor, His Imperial Highness, the Emperor Sayammak I.
I have never held more power than any other Chancellor and if people from Western countries think that I hold too much power, it is because they compare their leaders, who are elected by the mob and have to account to it, with our Absolute and Enlightened Monarchy. I am accountable only to His Imperial Majesty.
Unlike Mr. Takeshi, I never overthrew a Parliament or banned political parties, because they do not exist in the first place. Also, I have never armed mobs to be used against my political opponents. Instead, I rely to the trust of the Emperor and my loyalty to the Emperor and the nation. I face my political enemies with my actions, not by using mobs or by suppressing them. And the Emperor can kick me out of my office whenever he wants. I am just his servant who tries to do his best for the Emperor and the nation.
So, let this "New Ruchang" propaganda campaign end. I have been offended by this comparison between me and a mass murderer. In all those years I have been Chancellor, almost 15 (since 2097), I have never ever used military action except for stopping Indonesian extremism and even in this case, I have avoided at all costs civilian casualties.
S: While I, as a presenter, must stay neutral, I have to agree with you on this last remark. Personal attacks against you and comparing you to Mr. Ruchang is a bit too far. Anyway, my next question is: what is the future of Thailand. Has the Indonesian War changed anything?
Y: Our future is a peaceful one. Economic expansion and creation of new industries. The police action against Indonesia is more of a temporary measure to stabilize the region than any long term plan. We wish continued trade and economic cooperation with our partners and a stable and peaceful East Asia.
S: What will be your policy towards UAR, your strongest critics?
Y: We hope that after our police action, and when they realize that our intentions are to suppress extremists and stabilize the region and
not commit any kind of imperialism, relations between Thailand and UAR will stabilize once again and we can begin closer economic and trade relations.
S: Some critics of you cite that there is not much information about your personal life. What do you have to reply?
Y: I absolutely hate and disregard politicians who use their private life to gain political support. Private and public life should be differentiated. So, I have nothing more to say about this issue.
S: Thank you for coming here. I wish you a good day. I also wish a good day to all viewers. Have a good day!