eoc
Prince
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 526
Denmark?!
What the hell.. you go too far
Denmark?!
Except that the Persians are a Middle-Eastern civ, not Asian.
except that the persians are a middle-eastern civ, not asian.
An why are everyone mentioning civilizations like Poland, Denmark and Canada, that even don't exist in Civ4?
I don't like oriental civs besides Mongolia because they all have protective.
I think Vietnam is awsome too. You've defeated USA army and films about wars based on Vietnam is the most films presented by Hollywood.
Op-Ed said:Uh, just because USA chose not to nuke Vietnam off the face of the planet doesn't mean Vietnam defeated them. Most Global Power vs. Smaller Country wars end due to political divisions preventing the larger nation from truly committing to a course of victory (ie they defeat themselves). Rome was the last Global Power with the will to execute war, even so, they finally fell to squabbling and infighting over leadership. Global Powers since then have been the proverbial "clay mixed with iron". They have strength but no cohesion to effectively use it.
Back to OP:.
No love for the Ottomans?
After the Persians I'd say they are the strongest Asian civ gameplay-wise.
within eurasian empires, yes sealand may beSealand.