Is marrage irrational?

Is marrage irrational?


  • Total voters
    56
Marriage is a spiritual binding, a contract of unity. Love and sex are fine, but without marriage, they are empty.
 
It has nothing to do with spirituality. Marriage is a financial/social/cultural factor.

Just another of humanity's little mechanisms of stratification.

...
 
Marriage is a spiritual binding, a contract of unity. Love and sex are fine, but without marriage, they are empty.

That's not necessarily true. In France, you are married not by the Church, but the State: a Judge is the one who presides over the ceremony. You can get "married" in a Church also, if you wish, but its only a legal marriage if its performed by a Judge.


This also implies that only a religious party can be married, which is very much not the case.
 
This also implies that only a religious party can be married, which is very much not the case.

That is exactly what religious people wish to imply. If they do indeed even imply.

The think marriage was invented by their particular religion, just like morality.

Complete bunk, of course.

...
 
How does everyone define love? I would call love eternal, and thus it would be impossible to 'fall out of love with' someone, as then you would not have been in love anyway.

But then, I ain't bright. :(
 
Love is irrational. Marriage is irrational if based upon love; if based upon financial considerations it can be rational.
 
Elrohir said:
Love is irrational. Marriage is irrational if based upon love; if based upon financial considerations it can be rational.

Go sit in the corner and take your medication. ;)

I don't think that love is irrational, romantic love happens because each person makes the other feel a certain way and that leads to love. Sounds about as rational as 2+2 to me.
 
Go sit in the corner and take your medication. ;)

I don't think that love is irrational, romantic love happens because each person makes the other feel a certain way and that leads to love. Sounds about as rational as 2+2 to me.
I don't wanna! ;)

But is it possible to truly love someone for who they are, rather than simply how they can make you feel? If you only love someone because they make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, then you don't love them at all - you're just selfishly wanting to feel warm and fuzzy. If you can truly love someone, not just because they make you feel good, but simply because you love them for who they are, then that's great - but it's also not rationally in your best interest, or rational at all.

I'm not saying love is bad. On the contrary, I think it's a great thing. But it doesn't have to be rational for it to be positive.
 
It has nothing to do with spirituality. Marriage is a financial/social/cultural factor.

Just another of humanity's little mechanisms of stratification.

...

Kinda obvious who has been married and who has not. Being married for over 20 years, yes, I will say that marriage does have plenty to do with spirituality. Sharing such a bond with another person as to make yourselves one has far more to do with spirituality than it does finances or social-isms.
 
Kinda obvious who has been married and who has not. Being married for over 20 years, yes, I will say that marriage does have plenty to do with spirituality. Sharing such a bond with another person as to make yourselves one has far more to do with spirituality than it does finances or social-isms.
I have yet to have a divorce client express spiritual matters. Usually one partner screwing up the finances and/or socail arrangements are the reason they are in my office.
 
Sharing such a bond with another person as to make yourselves one has far more to do with spirituality than it does finances or social-isms.
Why spiritual and not emotional? And why do you use this definition?

I suspect that trying to find a universal reason for marriage is bound to failure. Marriage seems to be comprised of numerous different aspects and to try to boil it down to one would be to grossly oversimplify things.
 
I think marrage is irrational. I believe so because when you marry somebody you are promising two things; that you'll love each other forever, and that you won't fall in love with anybody else for the rest of your life, neither of which I think anybody can know for sure.

So what do you think? Is marrage irrational or not?


That depends on your definition of rational. From your personal perspective it might be, but I'm married and it makes sense in so many ways: emotional stability, companionship, shared goals stuff like that. And the whole is more than the sum of it's parts.

It seems very rational from a genes point of view, a stable marriage gives a stable home and balanced environment for kids IMHO. I think children who come from a stable background have less variables to worry about, and can concentrate on growing as people. Better for gene propogation and maybe why marriage is a meme.
 
I have yet to have a divorce client express spiritual matters.

Of course not....that would obviously be a marriage that has lost its spirituality.

Usually one partner screwing up the finances and/or socail arrangements are the reason they are in my office.

/shrug. People today dont understand what love really means. What can I say.
 
Why spiritual and not emotional? And why do you use this definition?

Because a true marriage with a spiritual relationship goes beyond emotion. Its honest to say that married couples will love each other and hate each other at times during their marriage. Thats just emotion. However, a true spiritual relationship will bypass emotion. People without that connection will get divorced at the drop of a hat - people with it will stick together through both the good times and the bad times.

For better or for worse does have meaning you know. Its not just a line in a ceremony.
 
Back
Top Bottom