Inqvisitor
King
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 885
Vatican II was not an infallible oecumenical council. By John XXIII's own intention, it was a pastoral council, outside the infallible protection of the Magisterium. You obviously do not know much about what constitutes "infallible" and what does not. The way things are now were never intended to be by John XXIII, whose dying words were "Stop the Council, stop the council..."CivGeneral said:I fell out of the Catholic Church at a young age of six. Only vaguly remember going to CCD classes. Never made first communion, never made it to confirmation, and never made it to first confession.
And the infallibility of eumenical councils dont mean a thing?
Firstly, I am not obsessed with syncretism. I am a mainstream Catholic who veiws The Vatican II as infallible as well as the infallibility of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI. I am a Catholic who accepted the realities of the modern Church in a post-Vatican II world.
Secondly, I am not anti-Catholic. I view the pope as the leader of the Christian church as well as believe in transubstiation. Being anti-Catholic is not one of them, I am just a Catholic who accepted the realities of the Church after the Second Vatican Council.
What is it you have against Pope Pius IX anyway?
