Any shaman who says "the universe" does not equal "everything" is just mystifying. I'd be highly suspicious of someone rigging their flawed "everything" model by saying there's another "everything" affecting it. On a mechanical level, that's like saying "God works in strange ways" or "Physics ceases to behave rationally". Sadly, Starlifter is right: "All in all, physics of the last 35 years has made remarkable strides to the account of creation in Genesis."
Thanks, Zarn. We've been needing some definitions. Universe = everything, whether you observe it or not! That includes all the Matter, obviously, in the microscope and the macroscope, anything we'll call Energy, good old Time, inscrutable Gravity, the very Laws we're making and revising... everything. So, when we ask "Is the universe infinite?" we are not merely asking how big it is, we're also asking (actually the same question) how small is the smallest, how old is the oldest, etc. because these things are all contained within our definition of universe and are suseptible to infinity.