Impaler[WrG]
Civ4:Col UI programmer
I use NotePad++ a GPL general use text editor that supports all 3 of the primary file types used in Civ4 (.cpp .xml .py). Though you may be more interested in an XML focused program
Yes I am more interseted in a XML focesed program that is not notepad and if you know of any could you post a link to it???Impaler[WrG] said:I use NotePad++ a GPL general use text editor that supports all 3 of the primary file types used in Civ4 (.cpp .xml .py). Though you may be more interested in an XML focused program
chef pablo said:ok first off Slavic,calm down there are some valid points in this string,i do feel your plight but need to take a realistic veiw. one dreamer, get educated!
onedreamer said:maybe americans should pay a visit to Europe and Asia and study their stories before making certain comments. You said "look at the Pyramids, Stonehenge, etc...". But have you been in front of them or you saw them in a picture ?
Have you been in the streets of a medieval european city ? You can't even call them streets. These cities were in danger to be razed every day and were built as tight as possible to be more defendable. That was also the reason for situations like the one you described. Or did you think that europeans were dirty pigs ?[/B]
the plague
[B]ive been ,was impressed but what i will never forget is standing on top of a temple in tical(the same temple in star wars where the x-wings took off out of the jungle)watching the sun go down ,howler monkeys in the back groand and a flock of parrots gliding over the canopy.[/B][/I
]The mesoamerican cities did not have as big threats as european ones
the mayan and the aztec fought, often they raided cities not for land but sacraficial victims. i think its a little scarier be a direct target rather than collateral damage.
, and even less northern native americans. Probably that is the main reason why they were militarily less advanced.
im not even going to touch this one.
Btw we're not discussing mesoamerican civs here, since we already have 2 of them in Civ4 and a wonder.
incan are south american not meso
It's hard to put a wonder in the game if you can't even connect it to a civ that built it because you know nothing of it.
who built stonehenge?
It's true that history is written by the winner, and what we know about the north american cultures are all suppositions if not for what has been written about them by the colonists, because sadly they didn't know written History.
A LOAD of other civs have been completely annihilated in the history of Man, not just native americans... what did you think ? But we do know many things about them because they themselves wrote about them.
If you want to be proud of native americans, you do not need to see them in a game where they won't fit well. Instead of calling pigs european civs or trying to defend pointless arguments like "the natives have been killed by small pox, otherwise europeans would have gotten kicked back"
little big horn
, why don't you try to be proud of what natives really achieved ? They lived in the respect and communion of Nature, an achievement BY FAR greater than building the serpent mound IMO, and an example that modern americans should try to follow instead of blatantly ignoring the health of our planet.[/
chef pablo said:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------dont worry this string seems to attract ignorance,it wont be the last time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
toldya
chef pablo said:grrrr, slavic ignore this guy ,he doesnt post for like a week and then has nothing constuctive anyway.
Slavic Sioux said:It is aslo quite ignorant to say learnt insted of learned so think abought that before you call some one ignorant.
Is there a lack of Native American and African wonders?
Slavic Sioux said:Look Onedreamer I will contact a moderator to make you leave this therad because it is not consructive, and you Obviously are trying to get your point across because I have notcied before you said anything today it was not on the first page thus meaning you looked for it meaning you are just trying to keep an arguement alive that doesn't need to be.
Please look at he title of this therad does it say this is a debate aboghut whether Europeans or Natives are better no it does'nt so why you do you just go into this therad and start one???Oh yah for aboght your racsim what's the point of being raciset and what possable perpose does it serve you???
Look ALcosta I do not think that Europeans are bad people in fact I would be attacking myself aswell (hence the name Slavic Sioux).Tecnncly I did not start this arguement in fact I wasn't wanting one at all.I just wanted wonder ideas and when ice2k4 said someting that was not too bad some people got offended by it (inculing me) and said something back.AlCosta15 said:And you're the one that started the Europe crap when everybody told you that the Native Americans were primitive.
Now for you Ice and aLcOSTA WOULD you like to hear what you want to???I will do that if you wantLet's also make a second differentiation. When you speak of Native American, I assume you mean civilized Native America (which was basically anything Mexico and south.) North of Mexico (North America) the indians were constantly moving with food, so built no wonders, becuase they built no cities.
Native American (South America, civilized) to me faces an even worse problem than Sub-Saharan Africa. There not even around today. They didn't have a written language, so we don't know what they did. As a matter of fact, we don't even know what their language was. They may of had wonders in ancient times, that weren't around by the time good ol' Columbus wiped 'em out. Since they didn't bother to write anything down, we don't know what there wonders were. And when Europe landed in South America, anything we today consider a wonder, they wouldn't have becasue they wouldn't be able to tell how long ago it was built. And nothing was a wonder in South America from 1492-1700 (in Europe's point of view) because the Europeans were so technologically advanced compared to them, everything they had was obsolete.
All you have done since you came on these forums is make stupid remarks and questions. You don't contribute anything to the modding world, but you do seem to think everybody should change their mods so that some stupid Native Americans can be included.Hopefully Slavic Sioux said:I completed a mod.
Slavic Sioux said:Look Onedreamer I will contact a moderator to make you leave this therad because it is not consructive, and you Obviously are trying to get your point across because I have notcied before you said anything today it was not on the first page thus meaning you looked for it meaning you are just trying to keep an arguement alive that doesn't need to be.
Please look at he title of this therad does it say this is a debate aboghut whether Europeans or Natives are better no it does'nt so why you do you just go into this therad and start one???Oh yah for aboght your racsim what's the point of being raciset and what possable perpose does it serve you???