ravensfire
Member of the Opposition
Having been a fairly long-time lurker of this game, I've found my self more and more fascinated by this discussion. Nothing before has produced so much discussion and emotion than this one simple subject.
Being a bit distanced, there are some very, very interested parallels to the US. Specifically, the continual give and take between the state governments and the federal government.
The issue is NOT workers. Really. It's a symptom, but it's not the issue. The issue is the division of power between the President/DP and the province Governor. CT is tasked with looking at the overall performance of the nation, and has specific, long-term goals in mind to accomplish this vision. The Governors have specific ideas for their provinces.
Where it gets interesting it that the DP really only has the power given to them by the Governor (excepting a few emergencies) - after all, who commands the units to be produced?
As Fanatika continues to grow, and the provinces increase in number, this problem will grow, and grow rapidly. You've just started to see the beginning of this issue.
So how to resolve it? First, a decision must be made - strong DP powers, or strong Governor powers. You cannot have an even split - it just won't happen. Second - a lot of people are caught up in this, way to caught up. Relax (deep breath), and drop it. Period. The past has happened, and a problem identified. Good - now fix it.
Here's a solution - Cooperation. My personal preference is for strong provincial rights. Why - the Govenor of a province should absolutely be concerned with improving their land. The President, at least at the beginning of each term, should determine the national goals, and what each province needs to do to contribute. The Governors need to take this information into consideration and make plans accordingly.
In this case, (enter hypothetical mode - please do NOT point fingers and say "That's what should have been done!"), CT determines that a national railroad is needed, and gets the layout. The Governors are then appraised of this goal, and informed that this is of high national importance, and to please make it a priority. The Governors then alter their own plans, and accomplish the goal.
Within each province, excepting emergencies, Governors control workers and militia. Militia being defined as those units intended for defense. All units assigned to the Army are controlled by the DP. For the most part, this division is obvious.
Once a province is done with a worker (for whatever reason), they may transfer this to another province. If this is done - they lose all control over that worker.
As workers are captured (er, freed), the DP retains control of them while in enemy territory. This allows for the creation of roads/rails/fortresses in enemy territory as needed. If the DP does not need them, they should be transferred to a province in need, as determined by the DP. The Governors should indicate if they need workers or not, as a group. Might I point out that the Senate would be an excellent body to determine this, being comprised of all Governors? They could determine the allocation strategy, relieving the DP of this task.
Everyone, this ongoing discussion has the look of two trains heading towards each other. Everyone knows it's going to be bac, but nobody can stop looking. Please, step back a bit from this.
Thanks,
Ravensfire
Being a bit distanced, there are some very, very interested parallels to the US. Specifically, the continual give and take between the state governments and the federal government.
The issue is NOT workers. Really. It's a symptom, but it's not the issue. The issue is the division of power between the President/DP and the province Governor. CT is tasked with looking at the overall performance of the nation, and has specific, long-term goals in mind to accomplish this vision. The Governors have specific ideas for their provinces.
Where it gets interesting it that the DP really only has the power given to them by the Governor (excepting a few emergencies) - after all, who commands the units to be produced?
As Fanatika continues to grow, and the provinces increase in number, this problem will grow, and grow rapidly. You've just started to see the beginning of this issue.
So how to resolve it? First, a decision must be made - strong DP powers, or strong Governor powers. You cannot have an even split - it just won't happen. Second - a lot of people are caught up in this, way to caught up. Relax (deep breath), and drop it. Period. The past has happened, and a problem identified. Good - now fix it.
Here's a solution - Cooperation. My personal preference is for strong provincial rights. Why - the Govenor of a province should absolutely be concerned with improving their land. The President, at least at the beginning of each term, should determine the national goals, and what each province needs to do to contribute. The Governors need to take this information into consideration and make plans accordingly.
In this case, (enter hypothetical mode - please do NOT point fingers and say "That's what should have been done!"), CT determines that a national railroad is needed, and gets the layout. The Governors are then appraised of this goal, and informed that this is of high national importance, and to please make it a priority. The Governors then alter their own plans, and accomplish the goal.
Within each province, excepting emergencies, Governors control workers and militia. Militia being defined as those units intended for defense. All units assigned to the Army are controlled by the DP. For the most part, this division is obvious.
Once a province is done with a worker (for whatever reason), they may transfer this to another province. If this is done - they lose all control over that worker.
As workers are captured (er, freed), the DP retains control of them while in enemy territory. This allows for the creation of roads/rails/fortresses in enemy territory as needed. If the DP does not need them, they should be transferred to a province in need, as determined by the DP. The Governors should indicate if they need workers or not, as a group. Might I point out that the Senate would be an excellent body to determine this, being comprised of all Governors? They could determine the allocation strategy, relieving the DP of this task.
Everyone, this ongoing discussion has the look of two trains heading towards each other. Everyone knows it's going to be bac, but nobody can stop looking. Please, step back a bit from this.
Thanks,
Ravensfire