Mr. G
Chieftain
And.....? What happened?Chieftess said:We used to do that way back in DG1 and 2. We had quite a few "Embassy Threads" in our main forum. Members were appointed Ambassadors to that demogame site.
And.....? What happened?Chieftess said:We used to do that way back in DG1 and 2. We had quite a few "Embassy Threads" in our main forum. Members were appointed Ambassadors to that demogame site.
Mr. G said:And.....? What happened?
Mr. G said:I'm sorry, what I mean is, did it work?
Octavian X said:How about more turns per session, then? One thirty-turn session per week? We'd have time to catch up and plan well during that week, I think.
Octavian X said:How about more turns per session, then? One thirty-turn session per week? We'd have time to catch up and plan well during that week, I think.
Chieftess said:In the old days, it was done by posting and pm's. Department leaders would post in other departments saying things like, "Since we're going to war in 25 turns, I'd like your province to build 15 of XYZ units", or, "Since we're going to war in 25 turns, and the Egyptians are between us and Persia, don't renew Persia's trade deals, as Egypt blocks their roads and ports.".
Another thought - if it's more singular, then what's the point of the turnchat thread all together? Or even turnchats? :/
My worry is that this will further water down the other advisor positions (and what the origanal game intent was -- to have them represent the Civ3 advisors) in that they have less and less to do, making the position seem less desirable.
RegentMan said:Man... if all of these people would sign-up and join, we'd have a whole new crop of ideas and members.
I say by a whole bunch, Strider said that he had some PMs from potential newbies stating that they wont join DG7 if it is a 5CC game.Nobody said:i wonder how much the 5cc will cut particpation
CivGeneral said:I say by a whole bunch, Strider said that he had some PMs from potential newbies stating that they wont join DG7 if it is a 5CC game.