Gwaja
King
I've been watching some YouTube content on Civ 4 more often lately, and found that we have 2 distinctively different opinions on how one would rank all the leaders in this game.
1st: I am not sure if this person also is an active member of this forum, and if you are, I would like an opportunity to ask, in more detail, if his playing strictly on earth maps at marathon speed (which I never play on that setting) has anything to do with his conclusion about certain questionable leaders being placed in tiers I find very difficult to agree with.
Huayna Capac in B tier, Ramses and Hatty at the very bottom tier, while placing Tokugawa and Churchill at the top S tier? I don't think I have ever found someone in this forum with similar opinions here.
So if you are here, please entertain me. ^_^
2nd: @Henrik75's list, which I generally agree with, for the most part. except minor details on whether one would be better suited in A tier instead of B tier and vice versa. But nothing as drastic as Hatty/Ramses and Toku.
Moderator Action: Moved to General....cheers Ms. Gwaja - lymond
1st: I am not sure if this person also is an active member of this forum, and if you are, I would like an opportunity to ask, in more detail, if his playing strictly on earth maps at marathon speed (which I never play on that setting) has anything to do with his conclusion about certain questionable leaders being placed in tiers I find very difficult to agree with.
Huayna Capac in B tier, Ramses and Hatty at the very bottom tier, while placing Tokugawa and Churchill at the top S tier? I don't think I have ever found someone in this forum with similar opinions here.
So if you are here, please entertain me. ^_^
2nd: @Henrik75's list, which I generally agree with, for the most part. except minor details on whether one would be better suited in A tier instead of B tier and vice versa. But nothing as drastic as Hatty/Ramses and Toku.
Moderator Action: Moved to General....cheers Ms. Gwaja - lymond
Last edited by a moderator: